Literature DB >> 26756137

Predicting the consequences of species loss using size-structured biodiversity approaches.

Ulrich Brose1,2, Julia L Blanchard3, Anna Eklöf4, Nuria Galiana5, Martin Hartvig6,7,8, Myriam R Hirt1,2, Gregor Kalinkat9,10, Marie C Nordström11, Eoin J O'Gorman12, Björn C Rall1,2, Florian D Schneider13, Elisa Thébault14, Ute Jacob15.   

Abstract

Understanding the consequences of species loss in complex ecological communities is one of the great challenges in current biodiversity research. For a long time, this topic has been addressed by traditional biodiversity experiments. Most of these approaches treat species as trait-free, taxonomic units characterizing communities only by species number without accounting for species traits. However, extinctions do not occur at random as there is a clear correlation between extinction risk and species traits. In this review, we assume that large species will be most threatened by extinction and use novel allometric and size-spectrum concepts that include body mass as a primary species trait at the levels of populations and individuals, respectively, to re-assess three classic debates on the relationships between biodiversity and (i) food-web structural complexity, (ii) community dynamic stability, and (iii) ecosystem functioning. Contrasting current expectations, size-structured approaches suggest that the loss of large species, that typically exploit most resource species, may lead to future food webs that are less interwoven and more structured by chains of interactions and compartments. The disruption of natural body-mass distributions maintaining food-web stability may trigger avalanches of secondary extinctions and strong trophic cascades with expected knock-on effects on the functionality of the ecosystems. Therefore, we argue that it is crucial to take into account body size as a species trait when analysing the consequences of biodiversity loss for natural ecosystems. Applying size-structured approaches provides an integrative ecological concept that enables a better understanding of each species' unique role across communities and the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss.
© 2016 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  allometric scaling; biodiversity; complexity; ecosystem functioning; extinctions; food webs; global change; size spectrum; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756137     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  15 in total

1.  Defaunation effects on plant recruitment depend on size matching and size trade-offs in seed-dispersal networks.

Authors:  Isabel Donoso; Matthias Schleuning; Daniel García; Jochen Fründ
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes.

Authors:  Ulrich Brose; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Temperature and productivity distinctly affect the species richness of ectothermic and endothermic multitrophic guilds along a tropical elevational gradient.

Authors:  Chaim J Lasmar; Clarissa Rosa; Antônio C M Queiroz; Cássio A Nunes; Mayara M G Imata; Guilherme P Alves; Gabriela B Nascimento; Ludson N Ázara; Letícia Vieira; Júlio Louzada; Rodrigo M Feitosa; Antonio D Brescovit; Marcelo Passamani; Carla R Ribas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Exceptional body size-extinction risk relations shed new light on the freshwater biodiversity crisis.

Authors:  Gregor Kalinkat; Sonja C Jähnig; Jonathan M Jeschke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Omnivore density affects community structure through multiple trophic cascades.

Authors:  Donald J Benkendorf; Howard H Whiteman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A multitrophic perspective on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research.

Authors:  Nico Eisenhauer; Holger Schielzeth; Andrew D Barnes; Kathryn Barry; Aletta Bonn; Ulrich Brose; Helge Bruelheide; Nina Buchmann; François Buscot; Anne Ebeling; Olga Ferlian; Grégoire T Freschet; Darren P Giling; Stephan Hättenschwiler; Helmut Hillebrand; Jes Hines; Forest Isbell; Eva Koller-France; Birgitta König-Ries; Hans de Kroon; Sebastian T Meyer; Alexandru Milcu; Jörg Müller; Charles A Nock; Jana S Petermann; Christiane Roscher; Christoph Scherber; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Bernhard Schmid; Stefan A Schnitzer; Andreas Schuldt; Teja Tscharntke; Manfred Türke; Nicole M van Dam; Fons van der Plas; Anja Vogel; Cameron Wagg; David A Wardle; Alexandra Weigelt; Wolfgang W Weisser; Christian Wirth; Malte Jochum
Journal:  Adv Ecol Res       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 7.429

7.  Species identity drives ecosystem function in a subsidy-dependent coastal ecosystem.

Authors:  Kyle A Emery; Jenifer E Dugan; R A Bailey; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Energy Flux: The Link between Multitrophic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning.

Authors:  Andrew D Barnes; Malte Jochum; Jonathan S Lefcheck; Nico Eisenhauer; Christoph Scherber; Mary I O'Connor; Peter de Ruiter; Ulrich Brose
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Freshwater Megafauna: Flagships for Freshwater Biodiversity under Threat.

Authors:  Savrina F Carrizo; Sonja C Jähnig; Vanessa Bremerich; Jörg Freyhof; Ian Harrison; Fengzhi He; Simone D Langhans; Klement Tockner; Christiane Zarfl; William Darwall
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 8.589

10.  Synergistic impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation on model ecosystems.

Authors:  Lewis J Bartlett; Tim Newbold; Drew W Purves; Derek P Tittensor; Michael B J Harfoot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.