| Literature DB >> 26755944 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncoupling proteins 2 (UCP2) plays an important role in energy regulation, previous studies suggested that UCP2 is an excellent candidate gene for human obesity and growth-related traits in cattle and chicks. The current study was designed to detect the genetic variation of UCP2 gene, and to explore the association between polymorphism of UCP2 gene and growth, carcass and meat quality traits in rabbits.Entities:
Keywords: Carcass; Growth; Meat quality; Rabbit; UCP2
Year: 2016 PMID: 26755944 PMCID: PMC4707775 DOI: 10.1186/s40781-016-0086-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
The information of primers for PCR and MassArray
| Primer | Purpose | Primer sequence (5′ → 3′) | Amplicon size (bp) | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Amplify exon 1 | F: CTGCTTAGGGACTTGGTGCTGT | 690 | 58.0 |
| R: AGCCCTTGGTGTAGAACTGTTTGA | ||||
| P2 | c.72G>A genotyping | 1st: ACGTTGGATGTCCTTCCTCCTGCAGGCAC | 102 | 49.8 |
| 2nd: ACGTTGGATGATGAGGTCATAGGTGACCAG |
The frequencies of allele and genotype of the c.72G>A loci
| Breeds ( | Genotype frequency ( | Allele frequency | Genetic characteristic |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | AG | GG | A | G | He | PIC | Ne | |||
| Ira (94) | 0.36 (34) | 0.51 (48) | 0.13 (12) | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 1.90 | 0.61 | >0.05 |
| Champagne (83) | 0.27 (22) | 0.60 (50) | 0.13 (11) | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 1.97 | 4.25 | <0.05 |
| Tianfu (71) | 0.17 (12) | 0.63 (45) | 0.20 (14) | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 1.99 | 5.12 | <0.05 |
| Total (248) | 0.27 (68) | 0.58 (143) | 0.15 (37) | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 1.99 | 7.30 | <0.01 |
He heterozygosity, PIC polymorphism information content, Ne effective number of alleles
x 2 Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium x 2 value. x 2 0.05(df = 1) = 3.84, x 2 0.01(df = 1) = 6.63
Association between c.72G>A in UCP2 gene with growth, carcass and meat quality traits in rabbit
| Traits1 | Genotypes |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA ( | AG ( | GG ( | ||
| BW28 (g) | 523.00 ± 12.09 | 534.01 ± 8.35 | 517.62 ± 14.15 | 0.538 |
| BW35 (g) | 858.36 ± 35.30 | 809.28 ± 20.84 | 794.16 ± 30.61 | 0.357 |
| BW70 (g) | 2208.50 ± 21.62A | 2183.85 ± 14.66A | 2130.99 ± 24.73B |
|
| BW84 (g) | 2568.17 ± 17.84A | 2533.93 ± 26.32A | 2495.61 ± 20.41B |
|
| ADG (g) | 36.04 ± 0.38a | 35.97 ± 0.65a | 32.82 ± 0.57b |
|
| EW (g) | 1333.85 ± 15.60A | 1330.53 ± 11.39A | 1248.37 ± 20.16B |
|
| ESP (%) | 0.5261 ± 0.0025 | 0.5271 ± 0.0018 | 0.5197 ± 0.0032 | 0.134 |
| SEW (g) | 1445.35 ± 16.64A | 1439.45 ± 12.16A | 1348.04 ± 21.51B |
|
| SESP (%) | 0.5700 ± 0.0025a | 0.5702 ± 0.0018a | 0.5612 ± 0.0032b |
|
| LpH24 | 5.72 ± 0.02A | 5.73 ± 0.01A | 5.81 ± 0.02B |
|
| HpH24 | 5.74 ± 0.01a | 5.73 ± 0.02a | 5.80 ± 0.01b |
|
| RMR (%) | 0.67 ± 0.0076 | 0.67 ± 0.0055 | 0.65 ± 0.0099 | 0.110 |
| IMF-HL (%) | 0.0043 ± 0.0004 | 0.0046 ± 0.0003 | 0.0048 ± 0.0006 | 0.737 |
| IMF-LL (%) | 0.0067 ± 0.0010 | 0.0077 ± 0.0007 | 0.0084 ± 0.0012 | 0.518 |
Values are presented by the least squares means ± standard error
a BW28, BW35, BW70, and BW84 body weight of 28, 35, 70 and 84 days of age, respectively, ADG average daily gain from 28 to 84 days of age, EW eviscerated weight, ESP eviscerated slaughter percentage, SEW semi-eviscerated weight, SESP semi-eviscerated slaughter percentage, LpH24 pH of longissimus muscle after slaughter 24 h, HpH24 pH of hind leg muscle after slaughter 24 h, IMF-LL intramuscular fat content of longissimus muscle, IMF-HL intramuscular fat content of hind leg muscle
*P-value: Overall significance value for an effect of the genotype, the boldface reflects the P value less than 0.05. Values with different letters (a, b and A, B) within the same row differ significantly at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively