Literature DB >> 26755781

Willingness to Exchange Health Information via Mobile Devices: Findings From a Population-Based Survey.

Katrina J Serrano1, Mandi Yu2, William T Riley2, Vaishali Patel3, Penelope Hughes3, Kathryn Marchesini3, Audie A Atienza2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The rapid proliferation of mobile devices offers unprecedented opportunities for patients and health care professionals to exchange health information electronically, but little is known about patients' willingness to exchange various types of health information using these devices. We examined willingness to exchange different types of health information via mobile devices, and assessed whether sociodemographic characteristics and trust in clinicians were associated with willingness in a nationally representative sample.
METHODS: We analyzed data for 3,165 patients captured in the 2013 Health Information National Trends Survey. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to test differences in willingness. Ordinal logistic regression analysis assessed correlates of willingness to exchange 9 types of information separately.
RESULTS: Participants were very willing to exchange appointment reminders (odds ratio [OR] = 6.66; 95% CI, 5.68-7.81), general health tips (OR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.74-2.38), medication reminders (OR = 2.73; 95% CI, 2.35-3.19), laboratory/test results (OR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.62-1.92), vital signs (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.48-1.80), lifestyle behaviors (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.58), and symptoms (OR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.46-1.79) as compared with diagnostic information. Older adults had lower odds of being more willing to exchange any type of information. Education, income, and trust in health care professional information correlated with willingness to exchange certain types of information.
CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were less willing to exchange via mobile devices information that may be considered sensitive or complex. Age, socioeconomic factors, and trust in professional information were associated with willingness to engage in mobile health information exchange. Both information type and demographic group should be considered when developing and tailoring mobile technologies for patient-clinician communication.
© 2016 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell phones; electronic mail; health information exchange; mobile health; patient/consumer attitudes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26755781      PMCID: PMC4709153          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  21 in total

1.  On weighting the rates in non-response weights.

Authors:  Roderick J Little; Sonya Vartivarian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Cancer patients' trust in their physician-a review.

Authors:  Marij A Hillen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Low-income, ethnically diverse consumers' perspective on health information exchange and personal health records.

Authors:  Vaishali N Patel; Rina V Dhopeshwarkar; Alison Edwards; Yolanda Barron; Antonios Likourezos; Luba Burd; Dmitry Olshansky; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.439

4.  Consumer experience with and attitudes toward health information technology: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Michael Silver; Melissa C Miller; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The promise of digital (mobile) health in cancer prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Nicholas Demos Panayi; Matthew Merritt Mars; Randy Burd
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Patient interest in sharing personal health record information: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Kim M Nazi; Carolyn L Turvey; Todd H Wagner; Susan S Woods; Larry C An
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  What Do People Affected by Cancer Think About Electronic Health Information Exchange? Results From the 2010 LIVESTRONG Electronic Health Information Exchange Survey and the 2008 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Ellen B Beckjord; Ruth Rechis; Stephanie Nutt; Lawrence Shulman; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Healthcare consumers' attitudes towards physician and personal use of health information exchange.

Authors:  Heather C O'Donnell; Vaishali Patel; Lisa M Kern; Yolanda Barrón; Paul Teixeira; Rina Dhopeshwarkar; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Levels and correlates of patient activation in health center settings: building strategies for improving health outcomes.

Authors:  Erica I Lubetkin; Wei-Hsin Lu; Marthe R Gold
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-08

10.  Developing predictive models of health literacy.

Authors:  Laurie T Martin; Teague Ruder; José J Escarce; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Daniel Sherman; Marc Elliott; Chloe E Bird; Allen Fremont; Charles Gasper; Arthur Culbert; Nicole Lurie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Leveraging Emerging Technologies and the "Internet of Things" to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care.

Authors:  Arlene E Chung; Roxanne E Jensen; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Progress on Broadband Access to the Internet and Use of Mobile Devices in the United States.

Authors:  Katrina J Serrano; Chan L Thai; Alexandra J Greenberg; Kelly D Blake; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Acceptance and Use of eHealth/mHealth Applications for Self-Management Among Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Yun Jiang; Brady T West; Debra L Barton; Marcelline R Harris
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Electronic Health Information Exchange Opportunities for Self-management of Care: Responses from Older Adults With and Without Cancer History in the United States.

Authors:  Shirley M Bluethmann; Kisha I Coa; Catherine M Alfano; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Big Data Just Got Bigger: Implications of Real-World Evidence and Patient-Entered Data on Health Care and Health Care Policy.

Authors:  Dana M George; Aaron E George; Kelly L George
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-10-16

7.  Getting patients in the door: medical appointment reminder preferences.

Authors:  Trisha M Crutchfield; Christine E Kistler
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Utilization of Cancer Information System for Breast Cancer Control in Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Omolola Salako; Alero Ann Robert; Kehinde Sharafadeen Okunade; Adeola Olatunji; Adeola Fakolade; Victor Isibor; Deborah Falode
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-08-24

9.  Public attitudes towards mobile health in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ihtimam Hossain; Zi Zhao Lim; Joshua Jia Le Ng; Wan Jia Koh; Pei Shieen Wong
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-09-26

10.  Efficacy of a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Promote HIV Risk Reduction Behaviors Among Young Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Diane Santa Maria; Nikhil Padhye; Michael Businelle; Yijiong Yang; Jennifer Jones; Alexis Sims; Marguerita Lightfoot
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.