Literature DB >> 26755344

Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Short-Axis Ice-Ball Margin as a Predictor of Outcome.

Benjamin H Ge1, Thomas J Guzzo2, Gregory J Nadolski1, Michael C Soulen1, Timothy W I Clark1, Stanley B Malkowicz2, Alan J Wein2, Stephen J Hunt1, S William Stavropoulos3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if CT characteristics of intraprocedural ice balls correlate with outcomes after cryoablation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 63 consecutive patients treated with renal cryoablation. Preprocedural and intraprocedural images were used to identify the size and location of renal tumors and ice balls as well as the tumor coverage and ice-ball margins. Review of follow-up imaging (1 mo and then 3-6-mo intervals) distinguished successful ablations from cases of residual tumor.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent successful ablation (n = 50; 79%) had a mean tumor diameter of 2.5 cm (range, 0.9-4.3 cm) and mean ice-ball margin of 0.4 cm (range, 0.2-1.2 cm). Patients with residual tumor (n = 13; 21%) had a mean tumor diameter of 3.8 cm (range, 1.8-4.5 cm) and mean ice-ball margin of -0.4 cm (range, -0.9 to 0.4 cm). Residual and undertreated tumors were larger and had smaller ice-ball margins than successfully treated tumors (P < .01). Ice-ball diameters were significantly smaller after image reformatting (P < .01). Ice-ball margins of 0.15 cm had 90% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 98% positive predictive value for successful ablation. Success was independent of tumor location or number of cryoprobes.
CONCLUSIONS: Ice-ball margin and real-time intraprocedural reformatting could be helpful in predicting renal cryoablation outcomes. Although a 0.5-cm margin is preferred, a well-centered ice ball with a short-axis margin greater than 0.15 cm strongly correlated with successful ablation.
Copyright © 2016 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26755344     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ablative Therapies for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: a Review of Different Modalities and Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas Kavoussi; Noah Canvasser; Jeffrey Caddedu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Renal cryoablation - a practical guide for interventional radiologists.

Authors:  Matthew Seager; Shankar Kumar; Emma Lim; Graham Munneke; Steve Bandula; Miles Walkden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Percutaneous MR-guided focal cryoablation for recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy: retrospective analysis of iceball margins and outcomes.

Authors:  Christiaan G Overduin; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Joyce G R Bomers; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  What do we actually know about exosomal microRNAs in kidney diseases?

Authors:  Qianyu Li; Zhiping Zhang; Min Yin; Cancan Cui; Yucheng Zhang; Yali Wang; Feng Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.