Literature DB >> 26754857

Differentiation between treatment-related changes and progressive disease in patients with high grade brain tumors using support vector machine classification based on DCE MRI.

Moran Artzi1,2, Gilad Liberman1,3, Guy Nadav1,4, Deborah T Blumenthal5, Felix Bokstein5, Orna Aizenstein1, Dafna Ben Bashat6,7,8.   

Abstract

Differentiation between treatment-related changes and progressive disease (PD) remains a major clinical challenge in the follow-up of patients with high grade brain tumors. The aim of this study was to differentiate between treatment-related changes and PD using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI. Twenty patients were scanned using conventional, DCE-MRI and MR spectroscopy (total of 44 MR scans). The enhanced lesion area was extracted using independent components analysis of the DCE data. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from the DCE data based on the Extended-Tofts-Model. Voxel based classification for treatment-related changes versus PD was performed in a patient-wise leave-one-out manner, using a support vector machine classifier. DCE parameters, K (trans), v e, k ep and v p, significantly differentiated between the tissue types. Classification results were validated using spectroscopy data showing significantly higher choline/creatine values in the extracted PD component compared to areas with treatment-related changes and normal appearing white matter, and high correlation between choline/creatine values and the percentage of the identified PD component within the lesion area (r = 0.77, p < 0.001). On the training data the sensitivity and specificity were 98 and 97 %, respectively, for the treatment-related changes component and 97 and 98 % for the PD component. This study proposes a methodology based on DCE-MRI to differentiate lesion areas into treatment-related changes versus PD, prospectively in each scan. Results may have major clinical importance for pre-operative planning, guidance for targeting biopsy, and early prediction of radiological outcomes in patients with high grade brain tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; Disease progression; Support vector machine; Treatment-related changes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26754857     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2055-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  36 in total

1.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kenya Murase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements.

Authors:  L S Hu; L C Baxter; K A Smith; B G Feuerstein; J P Karis; J M Eschbacher; S W Coons; P Nakaji; R F Yeh; J Debbins; J E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  MR spectroscopy in radiation injury.

Authors:  P C Sundgren
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Assessment of neovascular permeability in a pancreatic tumor model using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with contrast agents of different molecular weights.

Authors:  Louke J Delrue; Veerle Casneuf; Nancy Van Damme; Peter Blanckaert; Marc Peeters; Wim P Ceelen; Philippe C O Duyck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Model selection for DCE-T1 studies in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Rajan Jain; Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Tom Mikkelsen; Mei Lu; Quan Jiang; Lisa Scarpace; Ali S Arbab; Jayant Narang; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh; Ramesh Paudyal; James R Ewing
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from radiation injury: a pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sotirios Bisdas; Thomas Naegele; Rainer Ritz; Artemisia Dimostheni; Christina Pfannenberg; Matthias Reimold; Tong San Koh; Ulrike Ernemann
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy guided brain tumor resection: differentiation between recurrent glioma and radiation change in two diagnostically difficult cases.

Authors:  M C Preul; R Leblanc; Z Caramanos; R Kasrai; S Narayanan; D L Arnold
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Experimental evidence to support the hypothesis that damage to vascular endothelium plays the primary role in the development of late radiation-induced CNS injury.

Authors:  N Lyubimova; J W Hopewell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Advances in MRI assessment of gliomas and response to anti-VEGF therapy.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope; Jonathan R Young; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.081

View more
  13 in total

1.  Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging.

Authors:  M T Duong; J D Rudie; J Wang; L Xie; S Mohan; J C Gee; A M Rauschecker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Repeatability of dynamic contrast enhanced vp parameter in healthy subjects and patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Moran Artzi; Gilad Liberman; Deborah T Blumenthal; Felix Bokstein; Orna Aizenstein; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Measurement of murine kidney functional biomarkers using DCE-MRI: A multi-slice TRICKS technique and semi-automated image processing algorithm.

Authors:  Kai Jiang; Hui Tang; Prasanna K Mishra; Slobodan I Macura; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Precision Digital Oncology: Emerging Role of Radiomics-based Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence for Advanced Imaging and Characterization of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Reza Forghani
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  In Vivo DCE-MRI for the Discrimination Between Glioblastoma and Radiation Necrosis in Rats.

Authors:  Julie Bolcaen; Benedicte Descamps; Marjan Acou; Karel Deblaere; Caroline Van den Broecke; Tom Boterberg; Christian Vanhove; Ingeborg Goethals
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Brain Metastases Undergoing Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  J I Traylor; D C A Bastos; D Fuentes; M Muir; R Patel; V A Kumar; R J Stafford; G Rao; S S Prabhu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  A No-Math Primer on the Principles of Machine Learning for Radiologists.

Authors:  Matthew D Lee; Mohammed Elsayed; Sumit Chopra; Yvonne W Lui
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.641

8.  Differentiation of Pseudoprogression from True Progressionin Glioblastoma Patients after Standard Treatment: A Machine Learning Strategy Combinedwith Radiomics Features from T1-weighted Contrast-enhanced Imaging.

Authors:  Ying-Zhi Sun; Lin-Feng Yan; Yu Han; Hai-Yan Nan; Gang Xiao; Qiang Tian; Wen-Hui Pu; Ze-Yang Li; Xiao-Cheng Wei; Wen Wang; Guang-Bin Cui
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 9.  Machine learning and glioma imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  T C Booth; M Williams; A Luis; J Cardoso; K Ashkan; H Shuaib
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Comparison of machine learning methods for estimating case fatality ratios: An Ebola outbreak simulation study.

Authors:  Alpha Forna; Ilaria Dorigatti; Pierre Nouvellet; Christl A Donnelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.