| Literature DB >> 26754852 |
Orestis Efthimiou1, Thomas P A Debray2,3, Gert van Valkenhoef4, Sven Trelle5,6, Klea Panayidou5, Karel G M Moons2,3, Johannes B Reitsma2,3, Aijing Shang7, Georgia Salanti8.
Abstract
Pairwise meta-analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific interventions. The usefulness of pairwise meta-analysis is thus limited in real-life medical practice, where many competing interventions may be available for a certain condition and studies informing some of the pairwise comparisons may be lacking. This commonly encountered scenario has led to the development of network meta-analysis (NMA). In the last decade, several applications, methodological developments, and empirical studies in NMA have been published, and the area is thriving as its relevance to public health is increasingly recognized. This article presents a review of the relevant literature on NMA methodology aiming to pinpoint the developments that have appeared in the field.Keywords: comparing multiple interventions; indirect treatment comparison; mixed-treatment comparison; multiple-treatment meta-analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26754852 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Synth Methods ISSN: 1759-2879 Impact factor: 5.273