Literature DB >> 26754662

Dynamic risk stratification for medullary thyroid cancer according to the response to initial therapy.

Hyemi Kwon1, Won Gu Kim2, Min Ji Jeon1, Dong Eun Song3, Yu-Mi Lee4, Tae-Yon Sung4, Ki-Wook Chung4, Jong Ho Yoon4, Suck Joon Hong4, Jung Hwan Baek5, Jeong Hyun Lee5, Tae Yong Kim1, Won Bae Kim1, Young Kee Shong1.   

Abstract

Detecting persistent/recurrent disease of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is important. The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is useful for predicting disease-specific mortality, but is a static system and does not include postoperative serum calcitonin levels. We have focused on the clinical usefulness of dynamic risk stratification (DRS) using the best response to the initial therapy in MTC patients. A total of 120 MTC patients were classified into three DRS groups based on their responses to initial therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to TNM staging and DRS. In the DRS, 70, 23 and 7 % of the MTC patients were classified into excellent, biochemical incomplete, or structural incomplete response groups, respectively. On TNM staging, 37, 16, 13 and 35 % of patients were stages I-IV, respectively. There were significant differences in survivals according to TNM staging (p = 0.03) and DRS (p = 0.005). During the median follow-up of 6.2 years, 75 patients (63 %) demonstrated no evidence of disease (NED). About 60 and 17 % of patients in stages III and IV were NED, respectively. DRS predicted NED better than TNM staging according to the proportion of variance explained (PVE) (49.1 vs. 28.7 %, respectively). At the final follow-up, 88, 4 and 0 % of patients in excellent, biochemical incomplete, and structural incomplete response groups attained NED, respectively. DRS based on the best response to the initial therapy can provide useful prognostic information in addition to initial TNM staging for predicting of mortality, as well as the likelihood of NED in MTC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medullary thyroid carcinoma; Outcome; Prognosis; Thyroid neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26754662     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-015-0849-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  22 in total

Review 1.  Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Samuel A Wells; Sylvia L Asa; Henning Dralle; Rossella Elisei; Douglas B Evans; Robert F Gagel; Nancy Lee; Andreas Machens; Jeffrey F Moley; Furio Pacini; Friedhelm Raue; Karin Frank-Raue; Bruce Robinson; M Sara Rosenthal; Massimo Santoro; Martin Schlumberger; Manisha Shah; Steven G Waguespack
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  Risk stratification in medullary thyroid cancer: moving beyond static anatomic staging.

Authors:  R Michael Tuttle; I Ganly
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma: demographic, clinical, and pathologic predictors of survival in 1252 cases.

Authors:  Sanziana Roman; Rong Lin; Julie Ann Sosa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example.

Authors:  J D Brierley; T Panzarella; R W Tsang; M K Gospodarowicz; B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for tumour detection in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels.

Authors:  S Hoegerle; C Altehoefer; N Ghanem; I Brink; E Moser; E Nitzsche
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-01

6.  Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma. A population-based study of 15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program 1973-1991.

Authors:  F D Gilliland; W C Hunt; D M Morris; C R Key
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems.

Authors:  E Kebebew; P H Ituarte; A E Siperstein; Q Y Duh; O H Clark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Natural history, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of medullary thyroid cancer: 37 years experience on 157 patients.

Authors:  M R Pelizzo; I M Boschin; P Bernante; A Toniato; A Piotto; C Pagetta; O Nibale; L Rampin; P C Muzzio; D Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Pentagastrin stimulation test and early diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma using an immunoradiometric assay of calcitonin: comparison with genetic screening in hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  N Barbot; C Calmettes; I Schuffenecker; J P Saint-André; B Franc; V Rohmer; P Jallet; J C Bigorgne
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Long-term outcome of medullary thyroid carcinoma in patients with normal postoperative medical imaging.

Authors:  G Pellegriti; S Leboulleux; E Baudin; N Bellon; C Scollo; J P Travagli; M Schlumberger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic value of LODDS in medullary thyroid carcinoma based on competing risk model and propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Xu Cao; Xin Weng; Jiang Sheng Huang; Xia Long
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 2.  The Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in the Era of Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Brian Ng-Cheng-Hin; Kate L Newbold
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-15

3.  Completeness of RET testing in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma in Denmark 1997-2013: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Jes Sloth Mathiesen; Jens Peter Kroustrup; Peter Vestergaard; Kirstine Stochholm; Per Løgstrup Poulsen; Åse Krogh Rasmussen; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Sten Schytte; Stefano Christian Londero; Henrik Baymler Pedersen; Christoffer Holst Hahn; Jens Bentzen; Sören Möller; Mette Gaustadnes; Maria Rossing; Finn Cilius Nielsen; Kim Brixen; Anja Lisbeth Frederiksen; Christian Godballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 4.  Current Guidelines for Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mijin Kim; Bo Hyun Kim
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-06-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.