| Literature DB >> 26754616 |
Penchom Janwan1,2, Pewpan M Intapan3,4, Hiroshi Yamasaki5, Rutchanee Rodpai6,7, Porntip Laummaunwai8,9, Tongjit Thanchomnang10,11, Oranuch Sanpool12,13,14, Kaoru Kobayashi15, Katsuyoshi Takayama16, Yukuharu Kobayashi17, Wanchai Maleewong18,19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human gnathostomiasis is a serious tropical disease, which is often overlooked. There is an urgent need to improve tools to aid the potential diagnosis of the disease in endemic regions. To overcome this, we produced the immunochromatographic test (ICT) kit for a rapid and simple diagnosis of human gnathostomiasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26754616 PMCID: PMC4710017 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1294-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Types of human sera examined and diagnostic results of the ICT kit and the immunoblotting using the 24/21 kDa G. spinigerum antigen
| Type of serum samples | Number of positive/Total number | |
|---|---|---|
| ICT kit | Immunoblotting | |
| Healthy control | 0/20 | 0/20 |
| Confirmed gnathostomiasis | 9/9 | 9/9 |
| Suspected gnathostomiasis | 21/23 | 23/23 |
| Cysticercosis | 1/4 | 0/4 |
| Taeniasis | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Opisthorchiasis viverrini | 0/15 | 0/15 |
| Fascioliasis | 1/5 | 0/5 |
| Paragonimiasis | 1/10 | 0/10 |
| Angiostrongyliasis | 1/10 | 0/10 |
| Strongyloidiasis | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Hookworm infection | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Capillariasis | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Ascariasis | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Trichinellosis | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Sparganosis | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| Malaria | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Filariasis | 0/5 | 0/5 |
Fig. 1The KAN gnathostomiasis kit (a) with immunochromatographic assay for the diagnosis of human gnathostomiasis. Representative images of ICT strips on which positive (b) and negative (c) results are shown. Each diluted serum sample was dropped onto the inscription “sample”, and a buffer was applied onto inscription “buffer”. A criterion of the diagnostic result is whether a red band appears at the test (T) line within 15 minutes or not. In the positive serum sample, the test (T) line and control (C) line turned red (b) but in the negative serum sample, only the control (C) line turned red (c). The intensity of the bands was estimated visually (unaided) according to the reference board (d considering level 2 as the cutoff level)
Fig. 2The purified rGslic18 protein fused with His-tagged residues on 12 % sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis. The protein was stained with Coomasie Brilliant Blue. An arrow indicates band of the rGslic18 protein (14 kDa)
Comparison among ICT kit using rGslic18 and immunoblotting using 24/21 kDa G. spinigerum antigen
| Test type and results | Immunoblotting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ICT kita | No. positive | No. negative | Total |
| No. positive | 30 | 4 | 34 |
| No. negative | 2 | 130 | 132 |
| Total | 32 | 134 | 166 |
a There was no significant difference with immunoblotting (p > 0.05; Exact McNemar's test)