Mubashir Maqbool Wani1, Mubashir Rashid2, Riyaz Ahmad Dar3, Arshad Bashir3, Asif Sultan3, Iqbal Wani3, Shakir Rashid3, Mark O'Sullivan4. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Medical College Srinagar, Hospital for Bone and Joint Surgery, Barzulla, J&K, 190005, India. mubashirmaqboolwani@yahoo.co.in. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, J&K, 190018, India. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Medical College Srinagar, Hospital for Bone and Joint Surgery, Barzulla, J&K, 190005, India. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although external fixation and flexible intramedullary nailing have been extensively used in the management of pediatric femur fractures, there are very few studies, which have compared the results. The purpose of the study was to compare the results of external fixation and flexible intramedullary nailing in pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: Two groups of patients were treated by external fixator (EF) and flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) over two different but successive time periods and results compared. The first group (EF) consisted of 45 patients, and the second group had 50 patients. RESULTS: The age in EF group ranged from 6 to 14 years (average 9.93 years), and the age in FIN group ranged from 6 to 11 years (average 7.66 years). In the EF group, fixator was removed at an average of 12.23 weeks. In the FIN group, radiographic union was evident at an average time of 10.06 weeks. Pin-site infection was common in EF group. One patient had a re-fracture in EF group, and one patient had to be re-operated in FIN group after he developed anterior angulation of more than 30°. CONCLUSION: We believe that it is the discretion of the surgeon to operate on the femur fracture using either of the treatment modalities. Further randomized studies need to be conducted between these two treatment modalities.
PURPOSE: Although external fixation and flexible intramedullary nailing have been extensively used in the management of pediatric femur fractures, there are very few studies, which have compared the results. The purpose of the study was to compare the results of external fixation and flexible intramedullary nailing in pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: Two groups of patients were treated by external fixator (EF) and flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) over two different but successive time periods and results compared. The first group (EF) consisted of 45 patients, and the second group had 50 patients. RESULTS: The age in EF group ranged from 6 to 14 years (average 9.93 years), and the age in FIN group ranged from 6 to 11 years (average 7.66 years). In the EF group, fixator was removed at an average of 12.23 weeks. In the FIN group, radiographic union was evident at an average time of 10.06 weeks. Pin-site infection was common in EF group. One patient had a re-fracture in EF group, and one patient had to be re-operated in FIN group after he developed anterior angulation of more than 30°. CONCLUSION: We believe that it is the discretion of the surgeon to operate on the femur fracture using either of the treatment modalities. Further randomized studies need to be conducted between these two treatment modalities.
Authors: James G Wright; Elaine E L Wang; Janice L Owen; Derek Stephens; H Kerr Graham; Michael Hanlon; Gary R Nattrass; Rick A K Reynolds; Peter Coyte Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Mar 26-Apr 1 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Usha S Mani; Christopher T Sabatino; Sanjeev Sabharwal; David J Svach; Adam Suslak; Fred F Behrens Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.324