Literature DB >> 26753610

Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats.

Ralf S Mueller1, Thierry Olivry2, Pascal Prélaud3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To diagnose cutaneous adverse food reactions (CAFRs) in dogs and cats, dietary restriction-provocation trials are performed. Knowing the most common offending food allergens for these species would help determining the order of food challenges to optimize the time to diagnosis.
RESULTS: The search for, and review and analysis of the best evidence available as of January 16, 2015 suggests that the most likely food allergens contributing to canine CAFRs are beef, dairy products, chicken, and wheat. The most common food allergens in cats are beef, fish and chicken.
CONCLUSIONS: In dogs and cats, after a period of dietary restriction leading to the complete remission of clinical signs, food challenges to diagnose CAFR should begin with beef and dairy products, the most commonly recognized food allergens in these two species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26753610      PMCID: PMC4710035          DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0633-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Vet Res        ISSN: 1746-6148            Impact factor:   2.741


Background

The diagnosis of cutaneous adverse food reactions (CAFRs) in dogs and cats relies on the performance of dietary restriction-provocation trials. Knowing the most common offending allergens in these species would help determine which food challenges should be performed first to faster confirm the diagnosis of CAFR. Details of studies about allergens suspected of causing CAFRs in cats Details of studies about allergens suspected of causing CAFRs in cats

Clinical scenarios

You have two patients: The first is a 1-year-old male Labrador retriever with a 3-month history of pruritus and recurrent mucous diarrhea. This dog has been eating a commercial diet for the last 6 months. On physical examination, you do not detect anomalies besides soft stools on rectal palpation. Your second patient is a 2-year-old female spayed Persian cat that has been scratching her face for the last year. This self-trauma only responds partially to high dose of prednisolone. Physical examination reveals the cat to be thinner than expected and to have excoriations on the head and neck. You suspect that both patients could be reactive to their commercial diets, but you wonder which one of the ingredients listed on the labels would be the most likely sources of allergens.

Structured question

In dogs and cats suspected of CAFR, which food sources are most often reported to induce clinical signs after challenge?

Search strategy

The CAB Abstracts and Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) databases were searched on January 16, 2015, using the following string: ((dog or dogs or canine) or (cat or cats or feline)) and (food or diet*) and (allerg* or atop* or hypersens* or intolerance). The search was limited to the period 1985 to 2015. Bibliographies of identified articles were then further searched for additional relevant reports.

Identified evidence

Our literature search identified 140 and 1534 citations in CAB Abstracts and Web of Science, of which three [1-3] and 15 [1, 3–17] respectively contained relevant information. Citations that were not selected were those of articles not specifically identifying offending allergens in dogs and cats exhibiting clinical signs of CAFR. Six more relevant citations were identified in the bibliography of articles found with the electronic search [18-22], and three sources were abstracts of recent conference proceedings [23-25]. Offending allergens were reported in case reports [12, 14, 18, 22, 26] or case series of dogs and cats with clinical evidence of adverse food reaction [1–5, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 25, 27], in studies evaluating diagnostic techniques for adverse food reactions [5, 8, 9, 11, 17, 23, 24] or (rarely) in studies evaluating reaction patterns such as vasculitis or symmetrical lupoid onychitis with multiple causes [20, 21]. A positive rechallenge was considered the only solid evidence for identifying an offending allergen. From these selected publications, we added the number of cases in which positive challenges had occurred with the various food items, and the frequency of reaction among total number of dogs was calculated.

Evaluation of evidence

Altogether, at least one offending food allergen source was reported in each of the 297 dogs included in the selected studies [2, 4, 5, 7–13, 16–18, 20, 21, 23–26] (Table 1). The most frequently reported food allergens involved in CAFRs in dogs were beef (102 dogs, 34 %), dairy products (51 dogs, 17 %), chicken (45 dogs, 15 %), wheat (38 dogs, 13 %) and lamb (14, 5 %). Other less commonly reported offending food sources were soy (18 dogs, 6 %), corn (13 dogs, 4 %), egg (11 dogs, 4 %), pork (7 dogs, 2 %), fish and rice (5 dogs each, 2 %). Barley, rabbit, chocolate, kidney bean and tomato were also reported as food allergens for single dogs.
Table 1

Details of studies about allergens suspected of causing CAFRs in cats

ReferenceNumber of dogsNumber of individual rechallenges per dogDetails of rechallengesOffending allergens and comments
Walton [2]82unclearunclearcow's milk (22), tinned food (16), beef (13), wheat (11), mutton (6), egg, pork (3 each), herring (2), cod, maize, rabbit, dog biscuits, kidney bean (1 each)
Chesney [4]19unclear, but only 9 owners rechallenged their dogsunclearbeef (4), milk (3), chicken, dog biscuit (2 each), cheese, turkey, pork (1 each)
Guilford et al. [5]83 to 6rechallenge with corn, soy, cow's milk (8/8 each), wheat (2/8), lamb (7/8), beef (3/8) (14-16 g of each, once daily for 14 days)corn (2), wheat, milk (1 each)
Harvey [7]25at least 61 week of beef, milk, cheese, egg, mixer biscuit, bread in all dogs, additionally chicken, lamb and chocolate one each in 3 of the dogsbread and mixer biscuit (same 7 dogs), cheese and milk (same 7 dogs), beef (2), egg, lamb, chocolate (1 each)
Ishida et al. [8]89beef, chicken, chicken egg, wheat, corn, rice, tuna, cod, milk (increasing to 120 g daily for 7 days)beef (5), rice (3), egg, wheat, cod (1 each)
Jeffers et al. [9]136beef, cow's milk, chicken, chicken egg, soybean, wheat for 1 week eachbeef (12), milk (5), wheat (4), chicken, soybean (3 each), egg (2)
Jeffers et al. [10]255beef, chicken, chicken eggs, cow's milk, soy for 1 week eachbeef (15), soy (8), chicken, milk (7 each), wheat (6), 5 (egg)
Mueller and Tsohalis [11]8unclearunclearbeef (7), dairy (1), chicken (1)
Ohmori et al. [12]1unclearunclearbeef
Paterson [13]20at least 5Beef, dairy products, wheat, lamb and chicken for one week each as one additional test meal while on elimination diet followed by other allergens based on diet historybeef (13), lamb (5), gluten, egg (4 each), chicken, milk, pork (2 each), soy, corn (1 each)
Salzo [16]20unclear7 days of rechallengebeef (11), chicken (7), rice (5), milk, wheat (1 each)
Vaden et al. [17]671 meal containing a different allergen every other daychicken, corn (5 each), tofu (3), cottage cheese, wheat, lamb (2)
Coyner [18]11unclearbeef
Mueller et al. [20]15rechallenge with beef, cow's milk, chicken, mutton, wheat, details unclearbeef
Nicholls et al. [21]2unclearunclearbeef (2)
Johansen et al. [23]4unclearunclearbeef (2), pork, salmon (1 each)
Johansen et al. [24]5unclearunclearchicken (5), corn (3), but preselected out of a population with such allergies
Tarpataki and Nagy [25]39unclearunclearchicken (16), beef (12)
Fujimura et al. [26]1110 g of fresh tomato led to clinical signs within 30 minutestomato
At least one food allergen was identified in each one of the 78 cats reported in selected articles [1–3, 6, 14, 19, 22, 27] (Table 2) . The food sources most frequently causing CAFR in cats were beef (14 cats, 18 %), fish (13 cats, 17 %), chicken (4 cats, 5 %), wheat, corn and dairy products (3 cats each, 4 %) and lamb (2 cats, 3 %). Egg, barley and rabbit were also reported as offending allergens in individual cats.
Table 2

Details of studies about allergens suspected of causing CAFRs in cats

ReferenceNumber of catsNumber of individual rechallenges per catDetails of rechallengesOffending allergens and comments
Stogdale [1]26 in 1 cat, unclear in the otherChicken, fish, beef, horse, mutton, milk in one cat, various fresh meats and commercial foods in the other cat, details unclearchicken, fish, beef in the first cat,and not chicken and fish in the other cat (all other meats led to deterioration)
Walton [2]18unclearunclearcow's milk (7), beef (5), rabbit, chicken, whale meat (1 each)
White and Sequoia [3]14unclearvarious commercial diets, dairy products, fish were administered to 11 of 14 cats further details were not providedfish (6), dairy products (2)
Guilford et al. [6]16unclear, depending on the diet history15-50 g of allergen daily for 7 daysbeef, corn, wheat (3 each), gluten, barley, chicken, lamb, sardines, lactose, viscera, food additives (1 each)
Reedy [14]123 days of tuna and lambtuna, lamb (1)
Guaguère [19]10unclear2 weeks with each allergenbeef (4), milk (3), fish (2), egg (1)
Walton et al. [22]1unclear7 days with each allergenmilk
Vogelnest and Cheng [27]17beef, chicken, lamb, fish, diary, wheat for 7 days each (attempted only in 8 cats and completed in 6 of them)fish (2), chicken (1), beef (1)
There were several limitations in interpreting the data presented. In most studies details of the provocation with individual allergens were not provided. Furthermore, most reports only listed allergens associated with a deterioration of signs upon rechallenge, but not those associated with negative provocations; this could possibly bias the estimation of the prevalence of offending allergens. Only five studies had used a standardized rechallenge sequence in dogs [7–10, 13]. In these studies, beef, chicken, wheat, soy and dairy products were the most common involved allergens, reflecting the data gathered from the literature. In cats, only one study attempted those uniform provocations [27], and beef, fish and chicken were the allergens most commonly involved in that study. In addition the previous diet history was generally not provided, thereby preventing a clinically relevant interpretation of the data. Thus, the information gathered herein does not allow a true estimate of the prevalence of offending allergens nor any statement about the likelihood of positive provocations in relation to previously fed foods. Finally, the offending allergens found herein could merely reflect pet feeding habits in the preceding decades, and these allergens could change once new pet foods become fashionable and used more frequently.

Conclusion and implication for practitioners

In a dog living in Australia, Europe or North America, the allergens most likely contributing to CAFRs are beef, dairy products, chicken, wheat and lamb. As a result, these foods should be the first used for allergen provocation for CAFR diagnosis. In cats, the most common allergens causing CAFRs are beef, fish and chicken. Importantly, the identified evidence does not allow an estimation of the real prevalence of offending allergens in the population of dogs and cats with CAFR, as animals were usually only challenged with a small number of—but not all— allergens. As a result, the true prevalence of each offending allergens in dogs and cats is likely to be higher than that reported above. Importantly, all these estimates of prevalence will need to be reevaluated with prospective studies performing controlled rechallenges in a larger number of animals with a detailed history of their previous dietary exposure.
  17 in total

1.  A retrospective study of canine and feline cutaneous vasculitis.

Authors:  P R Nichols; D O Morris; K M Beale
Journal:  Vet Dermatol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.589

2.  Antigen-specific histamine release in dogs with food hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Rinei Ishida; Kenichi Masuda; Masahiro Sakaguchi; Keigo Kurata; Koichi Ohno; Hajime Tsujimoto
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Skin responses in the dog and cat to ingested allergens. Observations on one hundred confirmed cases.

Authors:  G S Walton
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1967-12-30       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Food sensitivity in the dog: a quantitative study.

Authors:  C J Chesney
Journal:  J Small Anim Pract       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Food hypersensitivity to lamb in a cat.

Authors:  L M Reedy
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Diagnostic testing of dogs for food hypersensitivity.

Authors:  J G Jeffers; K J Shanley; E K Meyer
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Responses of dogs with food allergies to single-ingredient dietary provocation.

Authors:  J G Jeffers; E K Meyer; E J Sosis
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  Oral allergy syndrome induced by tomato in a dog with Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollinosis.

Authors:  Masato Fujimura; Keitaro Ohmori; Kenichi Masuda; Hajime Tsujimoto; Masahiro Sakaguchi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.267

9.  Food hypersensitivity in cats: 14 cases (1982-1987)

Authors:  S D White; D Sequoia
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  Development of gastroscopic food sensitivity testing in dogs.

Authors:  W G Guilford; D R Strombeck; Q Rogers; O L Frick; C Lawoko
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  18 in total

1.  Assessment of dog owners' knowledge relating to the diagnosis and treatment of canine food allergies.

Authors:  Siarra Tiffany; Jacqueline M Parr; James Templeman; Anna K Shoveller; Rachel Manjos; Anthony Yu; Adronie Verbrugghe
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Detection of DNA from undeclared animal species in commercial canine and feline raw meat diets using qPCR.

Authors:  Allison Cox; Vincent E Defalque; Tyler J Udenberg; Samantha Barnum; Cara Wademan
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 3.  Outstanding animal studies in allergy I. From asthma to food allergy and anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Isabella Pali-Schöll; Franziska Roth-Walter
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-06

4.  Cornstarch is less allergenic than corn flour in dogs and cats previously sensitized to corn.

Authors:  Thierry Olivry; Jennifer Bexley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 5.  Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (9): time to flare of cutaneous signs after a dietary challenge in dogs and cats with food allergies.

Authors:  Thierry Olivry; Ralf S Mueller
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  DNA and Protein Analyses to Confirm the Absence of Cross-Contamination and Support the Clinical Reliability of Extensively Hydrolysed Diets for Adverse Food Reaction-Pets.

Authors:  Isabelle Lesponne; Jérôme Naar; Sébastien Planchon; Tommaso Serchi; Mauricio Montano
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-26

Review 7.  Atopic dermatitis in cats and dogs: a difficult disease for animals and owners.

Authors:  Natalie Katharina Yvonne Gedon; Ralf Steffen Mueller
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 8.  Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Dermatoses in the Feline Patient: A Review of Allergic Skin Disease in Cats.

Authors:  Alison Diesel
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2017-05-09

9.  Successful nutritional control of scratching and clinical signs associated with adverse food reaction: A randomized controlled COSCAD'18 adherent clinical trial in dogs in the United States.

Authors:  James L Weemhoff; Jennifer M MacLeay; John Brejda; Heidi Schiefelbein; Susan M Wernimont; Kathy L Gross
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Successful nutritional control of scratching and clinical signs associated with adverse food reaction: A randomized controlled COSCAD'18 adherent clinical trial in dogs in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  James L Weemhoff; Jennifer M MacLeay; John Brejda; Heidi Schiefelbein; Susan M Wernimont; Kathy L Gross
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.