Literature DB >> 26753103

Determination of specificity influencing residues for key transcription factor families.

Ronak Y Patel1, Christian Garde2, Gary D Stormo1.   

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) are major modulators of transcription and subsequent cellular processes. The binding of TFs to specific regulatory elements is governed by their specificity. Considering the gap between known TFs sequence and specificity, specificity prediction frameworks are highly desired. Key inputs to such frameworks are protein residues that modulate the specificity of TF under consideration. Simple measures like mutual information (MI) to delineate specificity influencing residues (SIRs) from alignment fail due to structural constraints imposed by the three-dimensional structure of protein. Structural restraints on the evolution of the amino-acid sequence lead to identification of false SIRs. In this manuscript we extended three methods (Direct Information, PSICOV and adjusted mutual information) that have been used to disentangle spurious indirect protein residue-residue contacts from direct contacts, to identify SIRs from joint alignments of amino-acids and specificity. We predicted SIRs forhomeodomain (HD), helix-loop-helix, LacI and GntR families of TFs using these methods and compared to MI. Using various measures, we show that the performance of these three methods is comparable but better than MI. Implication of these methods in specificity prediction framework is discussed. The methods are implemented as an R package and available along with the alignments at stormo.wustl.edu/SpecPred.

Entities:  

Keywords:  co-evolution; direct information; feature selection; motifs; protein-DNA interactions; residue co-variance; specificity determinants

Year:  2015        PMID: 26753103      PMCID: PMC4704119          DOI: 10.1007/s40484-015-0045-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Biol        ISSN: 2095-4689


  39 in total

Review 1.  DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins.

Authors:  S A Wolfe; L Nekludova; C O Pabo
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2000

2.  Probabilistic code for DNA recognition by proteins of the EGR family.

Authors:  Panayiotis V Benos; Alan S Lapedes; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Combining phylogenetic data with co-regulated genes to identify regulatory motifs.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  TALEN-mediated genome editing: prospects and perspectives.

Authors:  David A Wright; Ting Li; Bing Yang; Martin H Spalding
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  De novo prediction of DNA-binding specificities for Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins.

Authors:  Anton V Persikov; Mona Singh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data.

Authors:  Michele Magrane
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  FlyFactorSurvey: a database of Drosophila transcription factor binding specificities determined using the bacterial one-hybrid system.

Authors:  Lihua Julie Zhu; Ryan G Christensen; Majid Kazemian; Christopher J Hull; Metewo Selase Enuameh; Matthew D Basciotta; Jessie A Brasefield; Cong Zhu; Yuna Asriyan; David S Lapointe; Saurabh Sinha; Scot A Wolfe; Michael H Brodsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  UniPROBE, update 2011: expanded content and search tools in the online database of protein-binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Kimberly Robasky; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Ab initio prediction of transcription factor targets using structural knowledge.

Authors:  Tommy Kaplan; Nir Friedman; Hanah Margalit
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Mapping functional transcription factor networks from gene expression data.

Authors:  Brian C Haynes; Ezekiel J Maier; Michael H Kramer; Patricia I Wang; Holly Brown; Michael R Brent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  2 in total

1.  Odd one out? Functional tuning of Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate kinase is narrower than its allosteric, human counterpart.

Authors:  Braelyn M Page; Tyler A Martin; Collette L Wright; Lauren A Fenton; Maite T Villar; Qingling Tang; Antonio Artigues; Audrey Lamb; Aron W Fenton; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Coevolutionary Analysis Identifies Protein-Protein Interaction Sites between HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase.

Authors:  Madara Hetti Arachchilage; Helen Piontkivska
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2016-02-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.