Literature DB >> 26753018

What's Not Being Discussed, or Considered, in Science Publishing?

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva1.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID: 26753018      PMCID: PMC4690551          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.

Authors:  Ed Yong; Heidi Ledford; Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Publishing: The peer-review scam.

Authors:  Cat Ferguson; Adam Marcus; Ivan Oransky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Negative results: negative perceptions limit their potential for increasing reproducibility.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2015-07-07
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review.

Authors:  J Yan; A MacDonald; L-P Baisi; N Evaniew; M Bhandari; M Ghert
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.853

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.