Literature DB >> 26751981

Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.

Nathan G Mifsud1, Lena K L Oestreich1, Bradley N Jack1, Judith M Ford2, Brian J Roach2, Daniel H Mathalon2, Thomas J Whitford1.   

Abstract

Self-suppression refers to the phenomenon that sensations initiated by our own movements are typically less salient, and elicit an attenuated neural response, compared to sensations resulting from changes in the external world. Evidence for self-suppression is provided by previous ERP studies in the auditory modality, which have found that healthy participants typically exhibit a reduced auditory N1 component when auditory stimuli are self-initiated as opposed to externally initiated. However, the literature investigating self-suppression in the visual modality is sparse, with mixed findings and experimental protocols. An EEG study was conducted to expand our understanding of self-suppression across different sensory modalities. Healthy participants experienced either an auditory (tone) or visual (pattern-reversal) stimulus following a willed button press (self-initiated), a random interval (externally initiated, unpredictable onset), or a visual countdown (externally initiated, predictable onset-to match the intrinsic predictability of self-initiated stimuli), while EEG was continuously recorded. Reduced N1 amplitudes for self- versus externally initiated tones indicated that self-suppression occurred in the auditory domain. In contrast, the visual N145 component was amplified for self- versus externally initiated pattern reversals. Externally initiated conditions did not differ as a function of their predictability. These findings highlight a difference in sensory processing of self-initiated stimuli across modalities, and may have implications for clinical disorders that are ostensibly associated with abnormal self-suppression.
© 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action monitoring; ERPs; Motor control; Visual processes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26751981     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Premotor neural correlates of predictive motor timing for speech production and hand movement: evidence for a temporal predictive code in the motor system.

Authors:  Karim Johari; Roozbeh Behroozmand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning-Related Brain-Electrical Activity Dynamics Associated with the Subsequent Impact of Learnt Action-Outcome Associations.

Authors:  Fabian Baum; Uta Wolfensteller; Hannes Ruge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Incidental or Intentional? Different Brain Responses to One's Own Action Sounds in Hurdling vs. Tap Dancing.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Ima Trempler; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Movement and VIP Interneuron Activation Differentially Modulate Encoding in Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  James Bigelow; Ryan J Morrill; Jefferson Dekloe; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-09-18

5.  Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence.

Authors:  Dalila Burin; Alvise Battaglini; Lorenzo Pia; Giusy Falvo; Mattia Palombella; Adriana Salatino
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 10.479

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.