| Literature DB >> 26751105 |
Abstract
Two contrasting views toward the evaluation of multiple tests of constraints and control of Type 1 errors in structural equation modeling are presented. (a) Exploring; data helps researchers make decisions about inclusion of relevant model parameters and control of Type 1 errors hinders this process. (b) Exploring data is not likely to yield meaningful models unless we can limit the process on the basis of methods and theory, and controlling Type I errors is a useful device: to force us to limit our searches. Also, in evaluating multiple tests of constraints for applications other than exploratory analyses, we should control for Type I errors as we do in testing multiple comparisons in analysis of variance. We argue for the second perspective and present examples to illustrate methods for controlling Type 1 errors when making model comparisons.Entities:
Year: 1997 PMID: 26751105 DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multivariate Behav Res ISSN: 0027-3171 Impact factor: 5.923