| Literature DB >> 26751097 |
Maria M D'souza1, Richa Trivedi1, Kavita Singh1, Hemal Grover2, Ajay Choudhury3, Prabhjot Kaur1, Pawan Kumar1, Rajendra Prashad Tripathi1.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the present study is to evaluate diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) as a tool for detecting diffuse axonal injury in patients of acute, mild, and moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI), using two diffusion variables: Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). The correlation of these indices with the severity of post-concussive symptoms was also assessed.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; diffusion tensor tractography; mild and moderate traumatic brain injury; post-concussive symptoms; tractography
Year: 2015 PMID: 26751097 PMCID: PMC4693390 DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.169445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Radiol Imaging ISSN: 0970-2016
Demographic characteristics of participants
Summary of MR protocol
Figure 1 (A and B)A schematic presentation of the fiber tract reconstruction for the fornix (C) superior thalamic radiation (D) uncinate fasciculus and (E) corpus callosum, in the study participants. Column (i) shows the FA map overlaid on the MD map. For each tract, the section perpendicular to the tract was taken. Column (ii) shows the stable fiber mass map, which contains the signature segments of each tract. Column (iii) is an enlarged view of the signature segment. By clicking into it, the boundary of the ROI used for fiber generation is automatically drawn (seen as white line). Column (iv) shows the respective tract generated by the FACT algorithm (Fornix is constructed by placing three ROIs, one on the coronal section (A-i) and two bilateral ROIs on the axial (B-i) sections, and finally adding the fibers using the OR function)
Figure 2 (A and B)Representative fiber tractography of the corpus callosum (CC), uncinate fasciculus (UNC), superior thalamic radiation (STR), and fornix, in the controls and patients
Tractography differences in fractional anisotropy between TBI cases and controls
Tractography differences in fractional anisotropy between the three groups of control (a), mild TBI (b) and moderate TBI (c)
Tractography differences in mean diffusivity between TBI cases and controls
Tractography differences in mean diffusivity between the three groups of control (a), mild TBI (b) and moderate TBI (c)
Figure 3Scatter plot showing Rivermead post-concussion scores versus FA values of CC in 19 TBI subjects
Figure 4Scatter plot showing Rivermead post-concussion scores versus MD values of CC in 19 TBI subjects
Bivariate correlation analysis between tractography indices (FA and MD) and RPSQ scores in patients