Literature DB >> 26751010

Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.

Ain Simpson1, Simon M Laham2, Alan Page Fiske3.   

Abstract

Morality primarily serves social-relational functions. However, little research in moral psychology investigates how relational factors impact moral judgment, and a theoretically grounded approach to such investigations is lacking. We used Relational Models Theory and Moral Foundations Theory to explore how varying actor-victim relationships impacts judgment of different types of moral violations. Across three studies, using a diverse range of moral violations and varying the experimental design, relational context substantially influenced third-party judgment of moral violations, and typically independent of several factors strongly associated with moral judgment. Results lend novel but mixed support to Relationship Regulation Theory and provide some novel implications for Moral Foundations Theory. These studies highlight the importance of relational factors in moral psychology and provide guidelines for exploring how relational factors might shape moral judgment.

Keywords:  Moral foundations; Relationship Regulation Theory; moral judgment; relational context; relational models

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26751010     DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1140118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-4545


  7 in total

1.  Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change.

Authors:  Beyza Tepe; Ruth M J Byrne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others.

Authors:  Daniel A Yudkin; Ana P Gantman; Wilhelm Hofmann; Jordi Quoidbach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Trolley dilemma in the sky: Context matters when civilians and cadets make remotely piloted aircraft decisions.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Darcia Narvaez; Julaine D Zenk; Michael Villano; Charles R Crowell; Daniel R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Twentieth century morality: The rise and fall of moral concepts from 1900 to 2007.

Authors:  Melissa A Wheeler; Melanie J McGrath; Nick Haslam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  "You're still worth it": The moral and relational context of politically motivated unfriending decisions in online networks.

Authors:  German Neubaum; Manuel Cargnino; Stephan Winter; Shira Dvir-Gvirsman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information.

Authors:  Milan Andrejević; Daniel Feuerriegel; William Turner; Simon Laham; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.