Literature DB >> 26750452

Tissue loads applied by a novel medical device for closing large wounds.

Rona Katzengold1, Moris Topaz2, Amit Gefen3.   

Abstract

Closure of large soft tissue defects following surgery or trauma as well as closure of large chronic wounds constitutes substantial but common reconstructive challenges. In such cases, an attempt to use conventional suturing will result in high-tension closure, therefore alternative external skin stretching systems were developed. These types of devices were meant to reduce local mechanical loads in the skin and the underlying tissues, taking advantage of the viscoelastic properties of the skin, especially mechanical creep, for primary wound closure. Studies have shown the clinical advantages of skin stretching systems, however, quantitative bioengineering models, demonstrating closure of large wounds, are lacking. Here we present finite element (FE) modeling of the TopClosure(®) tension relief system (TRS) and its biomechanical efficacy in three (real) wound cases, compared with the alternative of a conventional surgical suturing closure technique. Our simulations showed that peak effective stresses on the skin were at least an order of magnitude greater (and sometimes nearly 2 orders-of-magnitude greater) when tension sutures were used with respect to the corresponding TRS data. For the tension suture simulations, the tensile stress was in the range of 415-648 MPa and in the TRS simulations, it was 16-30 MPa. Based on the present computational FE modeling, the TRS reduces localized tissue deformations and stress concentrations in skin and underlying tissues while closing large wounds, compared to the deformations and stresses that are inflicted during the process of suturing. This substantial reduction of loads allows surgeons to better employ the viscoelastic properties of the skin for primary wound closure.
Copyright © 2015 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element modeling; Soft tissue; Tension relief system; Tension sutures

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26750452     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2015.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  7 in total

1.  What makes a good head positioner for preventing occipital pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Rona Katzengold; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Reducing Wound Tension With DuoDERM™ Taping Technique.

Authors:  Amra Kuc; Deniz Dayicioglu
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-02-21

3.  Ex-Vivo Tissues Engineering Modeling for Reconstructive Surgery Using Human Adult Adipose Stem Cells and Polymeric Nanostructured Matrix.

Authors:  Francesco Morena; Chiara Argentati; Eleonora Calzoni; Marino Cordellini; Carla Emiliani; Francesco D'Angelo; Sabata Martino
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  A novel skin-stretching device for closing large skin-soft tissue defects after soft tissue sarcoma resection.

Authors:  Qiang Wu; Zengwu Shao; Yubin Li; Saroj Rai; Min Cui; Ying Yang; Baichuan Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  The mechanobiology theory of the development of medical device-related pressure ulcers revealed through a cell-scale computational modeling framework.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Raz Margi; Aleksei Orlov; Daria Orlova; Liran Azaria; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Case Report: Delayed Primary Wound Closure After Extensive Abdominal Wall Resection for Infection and Malignancy Using TopClosure®.

Authors:  Evgeny Solomonov; Muhammad Khalifa; Vladimir Rozentsvaig; Itzhak Koifman; Seema Biswas; Moris Topaz
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  The potential of a canister-based single-use negative-pressure wound therapy system delivering a greater and continuous absolute pressure level to facilitate better surgical wound care.

Authors:  Aleksei Orlov; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.099

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.