Literature DB >> 26749229

GlideScope Video Laryngoscope for Difficult Intubation in Emergency Patients: a Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Koorosh Ahmadi1, Mohsen Ebrahimi2, Amir Masoud Hashemian2, Saeed Sarshar3, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar4.   

Abstract

Macintosh direct laryngoscope has been the most widely used device for tracheal intubation. GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) has been recently introduced as an alternative device for performing intubation; however, its validity in emergency settings has not been thoroughly evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare Macintosh direct laryngoscope versus GVL for emergency endotracheal intubation. This quasi-randomized clinical trial was performed on 97 patients referred to Imam Reza Hospital whom all needed emergency intubation in 2011. Patients were divided into two groups of the easy airway and difficult airway; intubation was performed for patients with direct laryngoscopy or GVL. Then, the patients were evaluated in terms of demographic characteristics, successful intubation rate and intubation time. Data was analyzed by SPSS software 16. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics of the patients in both easy airway and difficult airway groups who intubated with direct laryngoscopy and GVL methods (P>0.05). In difficult airway group, a significant difference was found in successful intubation at the first attempt (60.9% vs. 87.5%; P=0.036), overall intubation time (32.7 ± 14.58 vs. 22.5±7.88; P<0.001) and first attempt intubation time (28.43 ± 12.51 vs. 21.48±7.8; P=0.001) between direct laryngoscopy and GVL. These variables were not significantly different between two methods in easy airway group. According to the results, GVL can be a useful alternative to direct laryngoscopy in emergency situations and especially in cases with a difficult airway.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficult airway; Direct laryngoscope; Tracheal intubation; Video laryngoscope

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26749229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Iran        ISSN: 0044-6025


  7 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Inpatient Emergency Intubation in Adults.

Authors:  Tanja Rombey; Mark Schieren; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

4.  Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.

Authors:  Marc Kriege; Christian Alflen; Irene Tzanova; Irene Schmidtmann; Tim Piepho; Ruediger R Noppens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jia Jiang; Danxu Ma; Bo Li; Yun Yue; Fushan Xue
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Current Evidences for the Use of UEscope in Airway Management.

Authors:  Fu-Shan Xue; Ben-Quan Yang; Ya-Yang Liu; Hui-Xian Li; Gui-Zhen Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  The association of body mass index with difficult tracheal intubation management by direct laryngoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Shen Sun; Shaoqiang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.