Literature DB >> 26748854

Shining a Light on Exploitative Host Control in a Photosynthetic Endosymbiosis.

Christopher D Lowe1, Ewan J Minter2, Duncan D Cameron3, Michael A Brockhurst4.   

Abstract

Endosymbiosis allows hosts to acquire new functional traits such that the combined host and endosymbiont can exploit vacant ecological niches and occupy novel environments [1, 2]; consequently, endosymbiosis affects the structure and function of ecosystems [3, 4]. However, for many endosymbioses, it is unknown whether their evolutionary basis is mutualism or exploitation [5-9]. We estimated the fitness consequences of symbiosis using the interaction between the protist host Paramecium bursaria and the algal symbiont Chlorella sp. [10]. Host fitness was strongly context dependent: whereas hosts benefited from symbiosis at high light intensity, carrying endosymbionts was costly to hosts in the dark and conferred no benefit over growing autonomously at intermediate light levels. Autonomous Chlorella densities increased monotonically with light intensity, whereas per-host symbiont load and symbiont abundance peaked at intermediate light levels and were lowest at high light intensity. This suggests that hosts controlled the costs of symbiosis by manipulating symbiont load according to light intensity. Photosynthetic efficiency was consistently lower for symbiotic compared to autonomous algae, suggesting nutritional constraints upon algae in symbiosis. At intermediate light levels, we observed the establishment of small populations of free-living algae alongside the hosts with endosymbionts, suggesting that symbionts could escape symbiosis, but only under conditions where hosts didn't benefit from symbiosis. Together, these data suggest that hosts exerted strong control over endosymbionts and that there were no conditions where this nutritional symbiosis was mutually beneficial. Our findings support theoretical predictions (e.g., [5, 9]) that controlled exploitation is an important evolutionary pathway toward stable endosymbiosis.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26748854     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  29 in total

1.  Endosymbiosis: The feeling is not mutual.

Authors:  Patrick J Keeling; John P McCutcheon
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Community coalescence: an eco-evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Meaghan Castledine; Pawel Sierocinski; Daniel Padfield; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Compartmentalization drives the evolution of symbiotic cooperation.

Authors:  Guillaume Chomicki; Gijsbert D A Werner; Stuart A West; E Toby Kiers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Coordination of host and symbiont gene expression reveals a metabolic tug-of-war between aphids and Buchnera.

Authors:  Thomas E Smith; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Context dependence in the symbiosis between Dictyostelium discoideum and Paraburkholderia.

Authors:  Trey J Scott; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 6.  An evolutionary balance: conservation vs innovation in ciliate membrane trafficking.

Authors:  Sabrice Guerrier; Helmut Plattner; Elisabeth Richardson; Joel B Dacks; Aaron P Turkewitz
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 6.215

7.  Bodo saltans (Kinetoplastida) is dependent on a novel Paracaedibacter-like endosymbiont that possesses multiple putative toxin-antitoxin systems.

Authors:  Samriti Midha; Daniel J Rigden; Stefanos Siozios; Gregory D D Hurst; Andrew P Jackson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Emergent RNA-RNA interactions can promote stability in a facultative phototrophic endosymbiosis.

Authors:  Benjamin H Jenkins; Finlay Maguire; Guy Leonard; Joshua D Eaton; Steven West; Benjamin E Housden; David S Milner; Thomas A Richards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Different Endosymbiotic Interactions in Two Hydra Species Reflect the Evolutionary History of Endosymbiosis.

Authors:  Masakazu Ishikawa; Ikuko Yuyama; Hiroshi Shimizu; Masafumi Nozawa; Kazuho Ikeo; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Q&A: Friends (but sometimes foes) within: the complex evolutionary ecology of symbioses between host and microbes.

Authors:  Nicole Gerardo; Gregory Hurst
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.