Alexander Viktorin1, Paul Lichtenstein2, Cecilia Lundholm2, Catarina Almqvist3, Brian M D'Onofrio4, Henrik Larsson2, Mikael Landén5, Patrik K E Magnusson2. 1. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, alexander.viktorin@ki.se. 2. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA and. 5. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depression around the time of pregnancy affects at least 1 in 8 women and treatment with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in pregnant women has been increasing, but research on adverse effects on the fetus have so far commonly used designs unable to account for confounding. We aimed to examine the effects of prenatal SSRI exposure on offspring size outcomes and gestational age, and disentangle whether associations observed were due to the medication or other factors. METHODS: We used a Swedish population-based cohort of 392,029 children and national registers to estimate the associations between prenatal exposure to SSRIs and depression on the outcomes birthweight, birth length, birth head circumference, gestational age at birth and preterm birth. A sub-sample of 1007 children was analysed in a within-family design that accounts for unmeasured parental genetic and environmental confounders. RESULTS: Crude analyses revealed associations between prenatal SSRI exposure, and offspring birth size and gestational age. However, in the within-family analyses, only the association between SSRI exposure and reduced gestational age (-2.3 days; 95% confidence interval -3.8 to -0.8) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that prenatal SSRI exposure may not be causally related to offspring birth size. Rather, our analyses suggest that the association could be caused by other underlying differences instead of the medication per se. A small reduction of gestational age was associated with SSRI exposure in the within-family analysis and could be due to either the exposure, or other factors changing between pregnancies.
BACKGROUND:Depression around the time of pregnancy affects at least 1 in 8 women and treatment with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in pregnant women has been increasing, but research on adverse effects on the fetus have so far commonly used designs unable to account for confounding. We aimed to examine the effects of prenatal SSRI exposure on offspring size outcomes and gestational age, and disentangle whether associations observed were due to the medication or other factors. METHODS: We used a Swedish population-based cohort of 392,029 children and national registers to estimate the associations between prenatal exposure to SSRIs and depression on the outcomes birthweight, birth length, birth head circumference, gestational age at birth and preterm birth. A sub-sample of 1007 children was analysed in a within-family design that accounts for unmeasured parental genetic and environmental confounders. RESULTS: Crude analyses revealed associations between prenatal SSRI exposure, and offspring birth size and gestational age. However, in the within-family analyses, only the association between SSRI exposure and reduced gestational age (-2.3 days; 95% confidence interval -3.8 to -0.8) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that prenatal SSRI exposure may not be causally related to offspring birth size. Rather, our analyses suggest that the association could be caused by other underlying differences instead of the medication per se. A small reduction of gestational age was associated with SSRI exposure in the within-family analysis and could be due to either the exposure, or other factors changing between pregnancies.
Authors: Alexander Viktorin; Rudolf Uher; Alexander Kolevzon; Abraham Reichenberg; Stephen Z Levine; Sven Sandin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ayesha C Sujan; Martin E Rickert; A Sara Öberg; Patrick D Quinn; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Catarina Almqvist; Paul Lichtenstein; Henrik Larsson; Brian M D'Onofrio Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Georgios Schoretsanitis; Sara V Carlini; Majnu John; John M Kane; Kristina M Deligiannidis Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2021 Sep-Oct 01 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Paige D Wartko; Noel S Weiss; Daniel A Enquobahrie; K C Gary Chan; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Beth A Mueller; Sascha Dublin Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2021 Jul-Aug 01 Impact factor: 3.153