Literature DB >> 26748164

Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Phase I Clinical Trial.

Shyam Natarajan1, Steven Raman2, Alan M Priester3, James Garritano3, Daniel J A Margolis2, Patricia Lieu4, Maria L Macairan4, Jiaoti Huang5, Warren Grundfest3, Leonard S Marks6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Focal laser ablation is an investigational technique to treat prostate cancer in a region confined manner via coagulative necrosis. This phase I trial primarily examines the safety of transrectal magnetic resonance imaging guided (in-bore) focal laser ablation in men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. An exploratory end point is cancer control after 6 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an institutional review board approved trial we studied focal laser ablation in 8 men with intermediate risk prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion. Focal laser ablation was performed by inserting a cylindrically diffusing, water cooled laser fiber into magnetic resonance visible regions of interest, followed by interstitial heating at 10 to 15 W for up to 3 minutes. Secondary safety monitors (thermal probes) were inserted to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance thermometry. Comprehensive magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy was performed after 6 months. Adverse events and health related quality of life questionnaires were recorded.
RESULTS: Focal laser ablation was successfully performed in all 8 subjects. No grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred and no changes in International Prostate Symptom Score or International Index of Erectile Function 5 were observed. Ablation zones, as measured by posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging, had a median volume of 3 cc or 7.7% of prostate volume. Prostate specific antigen decreased in 7 men (p <0.01). At followup magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy cancer was not detected in the ablation zone in 5 men but was present outside the treatment margin in 6 men.
CONCLUSIONS: Focal laser ablation of the prostate is feasible and safe in men with intermediate risk prostate cancer without serious adverse events or changes in urinary or sexual function at 6 months. Comprehensive biopsy followup indicates that larger treatment margins than previously thought necessary may be required for complete tumor ablation.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation techniques; laser therapy; multimodal imaging; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26748164     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Utility of Multiparametric MRI for Predicting Residual Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Focal Laser Ablation.

Authors:  Ely R Felker; Steven S Raman; David S K Lu; Mitch Tuttle; Daniel J Margolis; Fuad F ElKhoury; James Sayre; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  From novice to expert: analyzing the learning curve for MRI-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  R Mager; M P Brandt; H Borgmann; K M Gust; A Haferkamp; M Kurosch
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Focal Prostate Ablation.

Authors:  Sherif G Nour
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  3D Registration of mpMRI for Assessment of Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Clément Orczyk; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Artem Mikheev; Arnauld Villers; Myriam Bernaudin; Samir S Taneja; Samuel Valable; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Making a case "for" focal therapy of the prostate in intermediate risk prostate cancer: current perspective and ongoing trials.

Authors:  Alex Z Wang; Amir H Lebastchi; Luke P O'Connor; Michael Ahdoot; Sherif Mehralivand; Nitin Yerram; Samir S Taneja; Arvin K George; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; John F Ward; Pilar Laguna; Jean de la Rosette; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A tissue-mimicking prostate phantom for 980 nm laser interstitial thermal therapy.

Authors:  R Geoghegan; A Santamaria; A Priester; L Zhang; H Wu; W Grundfest; L Marks; S Natarajan
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.914

8.  A urologist's perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Arvin K George; Baris Turkbey; Subin G Valayil; Akhil Muthigi; Francesca Mertan; Michael Kongnyuy; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

9.  Biologic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Invisibility in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Jeremy B Kaplan; Srinivas Nallandhighal; Mandeep Takhar; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Matthew Lee; Junhee Yoon; Daniel H Hovelson; Komal R Plouffe; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Edward M Schaeffer; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tamara L Lotan; Todd M Morgan; Arvin K George; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Matthew S Davenport; Sungyong You; Scott A Tomlins; Nicole E Curci; Hyung L Kim; Daniel E Spratt; Aaron M Udager; Ganesh S Palapattu
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 10.  An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Nishanth Krishnananthan; Uri Lindner; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.