Literature DB >> 26748033

Preconditioning is hormesis part II: How the conditioning dose mediates protection: Dose optimization within temporal and mechanistic frameworks.

Edward J Calabrese1.   

Abstract

In Part I, hormetic doses of a variety of agents stimulated adaptive responses that conditioned and protected cells against the subsequent toxicity resulting from a second, higher dose (called a challenging dose) of the same or different agents. Herein (Part II), the optimal conditioning (hormetic) doses of many agents are documented, cellular mechanisms and temporal profiles are examined from which the conditioning (hormetic) responses are elicited, and the optimal conditioning doses are compared to the levels at which optimal protection occurs in response to the toxic challenge dose. Entry criteria for study evaluation required a conditioning mechanism-induced endpoint response, an hormetic/biphasic dose response for the protective response following the challenging dose, and a mechanistic assessment of how the conditioning dose afforded protection against a toxic challenging dose. The conditioning dose that demonstrated the largest increase in a mechanism-related conditioning (hormetic) response (i.e., prior to administration of the challenging dose) was the same dose that was optimally protective following the challenging dose. Specific receptor antagonists and/or inhibitors of cell signaling pathways which blocked the induction of conditioning (hormetic) effects during the conditioning period abolished the protective effects following the application of a challenge dose, thus identifying a specific and essential component of the hormetic mechanism. Conditioning responses often had sufficient doses to assess the nature of the dose response. In each of the cases these mechanism-based endpoints displayed an hormetic dose response. The present analysis reveals that hormetic biphasic dose responses were associated with both the conditioning process and the protective effects elicited following the challenging dose. Furthermore, based on optimal dosage, temporal relationships and the known mediating actions of receptor-based and/or cell signaling-based mechanisms, the protective effects were shown to be directly linked to the actions of the conditioning (hormetic) doses. These findings indicate that the biological/biomedical effects induced by conditioning represent a specific type of hormetic dose response and thereby contribute significantly to a generalization of the hormetic concept.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive response; Biphasic; Dose optimization; Dose response; Hormesis; Preconditioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26748033     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  29 in total

Review 1.  Post-conditioning hormesis creates a "subtraction to background" disease process: biological, aging, and environmental risk assessment implications.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Thyrotropin, but Not Thyroid-Stimulating Antibodies, Induces Biphasic Regulation of Gene Expression in Human Thyrocytes.

Authors:  Daesong Jang; Sarah J Morgan; Joanna Klubo-Gwiezdzinska; J Paul Banga; Susanne Neumann; Marvin C Gershengorn
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Anesthetic pretreatment confers thermotolerance on Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast.

Authors:  Anita Luethy; Christoph H Kindler; Joseph F Cotten
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  A dose of experimental hormesis: When mild stress protects and improves animal performance.

Authors:  Raymond Berry; Giancarlo López-Martínez
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 5.  Redox Mechanisms in Neurodegeneration: From Disease Outcomes to Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Juan I Sbodio; Solomon H Snyder; Bindu D Paul
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Conditioning Against the Pathology of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Rehana K Leak
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2018-04-28

Review 7.  PERM Hypothesis: The Fundamental Machinery Able to Elucidate the Role of Xenobiotics and Hormesis in Cell Survival and Homeostasis.

Authors:  Salvatore Chirumbolo; Geir Bjørklund
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Hormetic Response by Silver Nanoparticles on In Vitro Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Cv. Mex 69-290) Using a Temporary Immersion System.

Authors:  Jericó J Bello-Bello; Rocío A Chavez-Santoscoy; Carlos A Lecona-Guzmán; Nina Bogdanchikova; Josafhat Salinas-Ruíz; Fernando Carlos Gómez-Merino; Alexey Pestryakov
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Cadmium reduces the efficiency of Sindbis virus replication in human cells and promotes their survival by inhibiting apoptosis.

Authors:  Etienne Frumence; Marjolaine Roche; Pascale Guiraud
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2016-08-26

10.  Hormesis enables cells to handle accumulating toxic metabolites during increased energy flux.

Authors:  Johanna Zemva; Christoph Andreas Fink; Thomas Henry Fleming; Leonard Schmidt; Anne Loft; Stephan Herzig; Robert André Knieß; Matthias Mayer; Bernd Bukau; Peter Paul Nawroth; Jens Tyedmers
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 11.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.