Literature DB >> 2674769

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Work load and financial implications for a neuroradiology department.

D P Kingsley1, P Butler, G M Rowe, R C Travis, I G Wylie.   

Abstract

A four year study has been undertaken into the effects on the workload and cost implications of the introduction of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in a large United Kingdom teaching hospital. The increase in workload has been entirely due to the ability to perform intravenous angiography. DSA is cheaper than conventional angiography if more than 210 cases are undertaken each year. This difference is accounted for by the reduced use of X-ray film. However, intravenous angiography is more expensive because of the use of large volumes of nonionic medium.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2674769     DOI: 10.1007/bf00344351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  14 in total

1.  Reducing the cost of using contrast media: a look at discarded volumes.

Authors:  M L Kinnison; E P Steinberg; N R Powe; G F Anderson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Digital subtraction cerebral angiography by intraarterial injection: comparison with conventional angiography.

Authors:  M Brant-Zawadzki; R Gould; D Norman; T H Newton; B Lane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Cost of anaesthesia.

Authors:  B A Astley; J S Walker
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-07-17

4.  Complications of intravenous DSA performed for carotid artery disease: a prospective study.

Authors:  J O Aaron; J R Hesselink; R Oot; R L Jones; K R Davis; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.

Authors:  C R Bird; B P Drayer; R Velaj; P J Triolo; S Allen; M Bates; A E Yeates; E R Heinz; D R Osborne
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Complications of outpatient transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Work in progress.

Authors:  K J Gritter; W W Laidlaw; N T Peterson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Iohexol compared to meglumine-Ca-metrizoate in common carotid angiography. A randomized double blind cross-over study in man.

Authors:  P Nakstad; O Sortland; O Aaserud
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Comparative double-blind investigation of meglumine metrizoate, metrizamide, and iohexol in carotid angiography.

Authors:  T Hindmarsh; G Bergstrand; K Ericson; H Olivecrona
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Complications in cerebral angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque cerebral).

Authors:  I O Skalpe
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  A randomized blind trial of Iopamidol and meglumine calcium metrizoate (Triosil 280, Isopaque Cerebral) in cerebral angiography.

Authors:  A J Molyneux; P W Sheldon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.