Ross S Cairns1, Tamara Hew-Butler2. 1. Newcastle Sports Medicine, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia. 2. School of Health Science, 3157HHB, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309-4482, USA. hew@oakland.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It is not known if exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH) is a cause or consequence of exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER).We hypothesized that osmotic stress (EAH) coupled with mechanical stress (running) potentiated muscle cell breakdown (ER). This concept would be supported if a nadir in serum sodium concentration ([Na(+)]) temporally preceded peak creatine kinase levels (CK) during an ultramarathon run. METHODS: Fifteen participants ran ≥104 km and had blood drawn: prior to start; 53; 104 km; and 24-h post run. Serum [Na(+)], CK, urea, creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured from serial blood samples. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine differences regarding both race distance and natremia status. RESULTS: Ten of 15 participants demonstrated EAH (serum [Na(+)] <135 mmol/L) at least once during serial testing. Participants were categorized post hoc into one of three natremia groups based on lowest recorded [Na(+)]: (1) <129 mmol/L (n = 3; moderate EAH); (2) between 129 and 134 mmol/L (n = 7; mild EAH); and (3) >134 mmol/L (n = 5; normonatremia). Participants with lowest [Na(+)] demonstrated highest CK values at subsequent checkpoints. Significant natremia group differences noted at the 53 km point (p = 0.0002) for [Na(+)] while significant natremia group effect noted for CK seen at the 24-h post-finish testing point (p = 0.02). Significant natremia group effects noted for renal biomarkers, with the moderate EAH group documenting the lowest eGFR (p = 0.005), and highest serum urea (p = 0.0006) and creatinine (p < 0.0001) levels. Hyponatremic runners had lower post-race urine [Na(+)] than normonatremic runners (26 ± 15 vs. 89 ± 79 mmol/L; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data support the possibility that transient hypovolemic EAH may precede and augment CK during an ultramarathon.
PURPOSE: It is not known if exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH) is a cause or consequence of exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER).We hypothesized that osmotic stress (EAH) coupled with mechanical stress (running) potentiated muscle cell breakdown (ER). This concept would be supported if a nadir in serum sodium concentration ([Na(+)]) temporally preceded peak creatine kinase levels (CK) during an ultramarathon run. METHODS: Fifteen participants ran ≥104 km and had blood drawn: prior to start; 53; 104 km; and 24-h post run. Serum [Na(+)], CK, urea, creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured from serial blood samples. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine differences regarding both race distance and natremia status. RESULTS: Ten of 15 participants demonstrated EAH (serum [Na(+)] <135 mmol/L) at least once during serial testing. Participants were categorized post hoc into one of three natremia groups based on lowest recorded [Na(+)]: (1) <129 mmol/L (n = 3; moderate EAH); (2) between 129 and 134 mmol/L (n = 7; mild EAH); and (3) >134 mmol/L (n = 5; normonatremia). Participants with lowest [Na(+)] demonstrated highest CK values at subsequent checkpoints. Significant natremia group differences noted at the 53 km point (p = 0.0002) for [Na(+)] while significant natremia group effect noted for CK seen at the 24-h post-finish testing point (p = 0.02). Significant natremia group effects noted for renal biomarkers, with the moderate EAH group documenting the lowest eGFR (p = 0.005), and highest serum urea (p = 0.0006) and creatinine (p < 0.0001) levels. Hyponatremic runners had lower post-race urine [Na(+)] than normonatremic runners (26 ± 15 vs. 89 ± 79 mmol/L; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data support the possibility that transient hypovolemic EAH may precede and augment CK during an ultramarathon.
Authors: Peter A McCullough; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Michael J Gallagher; James M Colar; Timothy Geddes; Jeffrey M Gold; Justin E Trivax Journal: Nephrology (Carlton) Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Christian Overgaard-Steensen; Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen; Anders Larsson; Martin Broch-Lips; Else Tønnesen; Jørgen Frøkiaer; Troels Ring Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Priscilla M Clarkson; Amy K Kearns; Pierre Rouzier; Richard Rubin; Paul D Thompson Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: G Lippi; F Schena; G L Salvagno; C Tarperi; M Montagnana; M Gelati; G Banfi; G C Guidi Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Brendon P McDermott; Scott A Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Douglas J Casa; Samuel N Cheuvront; Larry Cooper; W Larry Kenney; Francis G O'Connor; William O Roberts Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Orlando Laitano; Laila H Sheikh; Alex J Mattingly; Kevin O Murray; Leonardo F Ferreira; Thomas L Clanton Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 4.566