Literature DB >> 26747247

PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma study.

Sally F Barrington1, Amy A Kirkwood2, Antonella Franceschetto3, Michael J Fulham4, Thomas H Roberts2, Helén Almquist5, Eva Brun6, Karin Hjorthaug7, Zaid N Viney8, Lucy C Pike1, Massimo Federico9, Stefano Luminari9, John Radford10, Judith Trotman11, Alexander Fosså12, Leanne Berkahn13, Daniel Molin14, Francesco D'Amore15, Donald A Sinclair1, Paul Smith2, Michael J O'Doherty1, Lindsey Stevens2, Peter W Johnson16.   

Abstract

International guidelines recommend that positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) should replace CT in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The aims of this study were to compare PET-CT with CT for staging and measure agreement between expert and local readers, using a 5-point scale (Deauville criteria), to adapt treatment in a clinical trial: Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL). Patients were staged using clinical assessment, CT, and bone marrow biopsy (RATHL stage). PET-CT was performed at baseline (PET0) and after 2 chemotherapy cycles (PET2) in a response-adapted design. PET-CT was reported centrally by experts at 5 national core laboratories. Local readers optionally scored PET2 scans. The RATHL and PET-CT stages were compared. Agreement among experts and between expert and local readers was measured. RATHL and PET0 stage were concordant in 938 (80%) patients. PET-CT upstaged 159 (14%) and downstaged 74 (6%) patients. Upstaging by extranodal disease in bone marrow (92), lung (11), or multiple sites (12) on PET-CT accounted for most discrepancies. Follow-up of discrepant findings confirmed the PET characterization of lesions in the vast majority. Five patients were upstaged by marrow biopsy and 7 by contrast-enhanced CT in the bowel and/or liver or spleen. PET2 agreement among experts (140 scans) with a κ (95% confidence interval) of 0.84 (0.76-0.91) was very good and between experts and local readers (300 scans) at 0.77 (0.68-0.86) was good. These results confirm PET-CT as the modern standard for staging HL and that response assessment using Deauville criteria is robust, enabling translation of RATHL results into clinical practice.
© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26747247     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-679407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  36 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction through combining positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and diagnostic CT in children and young adults with lymphoma.

Authors:  Zhihua Qi; Erica L Gates; Maureen M O'Brien; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-28

2.  Chemotherapy-induced coronary arteries calcium score deterioration as detected with unenhanced CT portion of FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Sabbagh; Medhat M Osman; Mark Fesler; Tarek Helmy; Nadeem Parker; Razi Muzaffar
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

3.  Advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: End-of-treatment FDG-PET should be maintained.

Authors:  Elif Hindié; Charles Mesguich; Krimo Bouabdallah; Noël Milpied
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  FDG-PET as a biomarker for early response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as well as in Hodgkin lymphoma? Ready for implementation in clinical practice?

Authors:  Josée M Zijlstra; Coreline N Burggraaff; Marie José Kersten; Sally F Barrington
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Reply to the letter.

Authors:  Hajira Ilyas; N George Mikhaeel; Joel T Dunn; Fareen Rahman; Henrik Møller; Daniel Smith; Sally F Barrington
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  How can we better predict treatment outcomes in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Authors:  Claudio Agostinelli
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-20

7.  Positron Emission Tomography Score Has Greater Prognostic Significance Than Pretreatment Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma in the UK RAPID Study.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; Elizabeth H Phillips; Nicholas Counsell; Barry Hancock; Ruth Pettengell; Peter Johnson; William Townsend; Dominic Culligan; Bilyana Popova; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Andrew McMillan; Peter Hoskin; Michael J O'Doherty; Tim Illidge; John Radford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  PET-guided clinical trials in Hodgkin lymphoma: to agree or not to agree, that is the reviewer's question.

Authors:  A Gallamini; M Meignan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Reply to: "All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting".

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Blandine Enilorac; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Prognostic significance of baseline metabolic tumor volume in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Alison J Moskowitz; Heiko Schöder; Somali Gavane; Katie L Thoren; Martin Fleisher; Joachim Yahalom; Susan J McCall; Briana R Cadzin; Stephanie Y Fox; John Gerecitano; Ravinder Grewal; Paul A Hamlin; Steven M Horwitz; Anita Kumar; Matthew Matasar; Andy Ni; Ariela Noy; M Lia Palomba; Miguel-Angel Perales; Carol S Portlock; Craig Sauter; David Straus; Anas Younes; Andrew D Zelenetz; Craig H Moskowitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.