| Literature DB >> 26747247 |
Sally F Barrington1, Amy A Kirkwood2, Antonella Franceschetto3, Michael J Fulham4, Thomas H Roberts2, Helén Almquist5, Eva Brun6, Karin Hjorthaug7, Zaid N Viney8, Lucy C Pike1, Massimo Federico9, Stefano Luminari9, John Radford10, Judith Trotman11, Alexander Fosså12, Leanne Berkahn13, Daniel Molin14, Francesco D'Amore15, Donald A Sinclair1, Paul Smith2, Michael J O'Doherty1, Lindsey Stevens2, Peter W Johnson16.
Abstract
International guidelines recommend that positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) should replace CT in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The aims of this study were to compare PET-CT with CT for staging and measure agreement between expert and local readers, using a 5-point scale (Deauville criteria), to adapt treatment in a clinical trial: Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL). Patients were staged using clinical assessment, CT, and bone marrow biopsy (RATHL stage). PET-CT was performed at baseline (PET0) and after 2 chemotherapy cycles (PET2) in a response-adapted design. PET-CT was reported centrally by experts at 5 national core laboratories. Local readers optionally scored PET2 scans. The RATHL and PET-CT stages were compared. Agreement among experts and between expert and local readers was measured. RATHL and PET0 stage were concordant in 938 (80%) patients. PET-CT upstaged 159 (14%) and downstaged 74 (6%) patients. Upstaging by extranodal disease in bone marrow (92), lung (11), or multiple sites (12) on PET-CT accounted for most discrepancies. Follow-up of discrepant findings confirmed the PET characterization of lesions in the vast majority. Five patients were upstaged by marrow biopsy and 7 by contrast-enhanced CT in the bowel and/or liver or spleen. PET2 agreement among experts (140 scans) with a κ (95% confidence interval) of 0.84 (0.76-0.91) was very good and between experts and local readers (300 scans) at 0.77 (0.68-0.86) was good. These results confirm PET-CT as the modern standard for staging HL and that response assessment using Deauville criteria is robust, enabling translation of RATHL results into clinical practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26747247 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-679407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113