Literature DB >> 26746848

Dim-light photoreceptor of chub mackerel Scomber japonicus and the photoresponse upon illumination with LEDs of different wavelengths.

Jun-Chul Jang1,2, Mi-Jin Choi1, Yong-Soo Yang3, Hyung-Been Lee3, Young-Moon Yu2, Jong-Myoung Kim4,5.   

Abstract

To study the absorption characteristics of rhodopsin, a dim-light photoreceptor, in chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) and the relationship between light wavelengths on the photoresponse, the rod opsin gene was cloned into an expression vector, pMT4. Recombinant opsin was transiently expressed in COS-1 cells and reconstituted with 11-cis-retinal. Cells containing the regenerated rhodopsin were solubilized and subjected to UV/Vis spectroscopic analysis in the dark and upon illumination. Difference spectra from the lysates indicated an absorption maximum of mackerel rhodopsin around 500 nm. Four types of light-emitting diode (LED) modules with different wavelengths (red, peak 627 nm; cyan, 505 nm; blue, 442 nm; white, 447 + 560 nm) were constructed to examine their effects on the photoresponse in chub mackerel. Behavioral responses of the mackerels, including speed and frequencies acclimated in the dark and upon LED illumination, were analyzed using an underwater acoustic camera. Compared to an average speed of 22.25 ± 1.57 cm/s of mackerel movement in the dark, speed increased to 22.97 ± 0.29, 24.66 ± 1.06, 26.28 ± 2.28, and 25.19 ± 1.91 cm/s upon exposure to red, blue, cyan, and white LEDs, respectively. There were increases of 103.48 ± 1.58, 109.37 ± 5.29, 118.48 ± 10.82, and 109.43 ± 3.92 %, respectively, in the relative speed of the fishes upon illumination with red, blue, cyan, and white LEDs compared with that in the dark (set at 100 %). Similar rate of wavelength-dependent responses was observed in a frequency analysis. These results indicate that an LED emitting a peak wavelength close to an absorption maximum of rhodopsin is more effective at eliciting a response to light.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chub mackerel; G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); Light-emitting diodes (LED); Photoresponse; Rhodopsin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26746848     DOI: 10.1007/s10695-015-0193-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0920-1742            Impact factor:   2.794


  24 in total

1.  Spectral tuning and molecular evolution of rod visual pigments in the species flock of cottoid fish in Lake Baikal.

Authors:  D M Hunt; J Fitzgibbon; S J Slobodyanyuk; J K Bowmaker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual pigments in teleost fishes: effects of habitat, microhabitat, and behavior on visual system evolution.

Authors:  J S Levine; E F MacNichol
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-06

3.  Monoclonal antibodies to rhodopsin: characterization, cross-reactivity, and application as structural probes.

Authors:  R S Molday; D MacKenzie
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1983-02-01       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Rhodopsin mutants that bind but fail to activate transducin.

Authors:  R R Franke; B König; T P Sakmar; H G Khorana; K P Hofmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Structure and function in rhodopsin: a tetracycline-inducible system in stable mammalian cell lines for high-level expression of opsin mutants.

Authors:  Philip J Reeves; Jong-Myoung Kim; H Gobind Khorana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A novel rod-like opsin isolated from the extra-retinal photoreceptors of teleost fish.

Authors:  A R Philp; J Bellingham; J Garcia-Fernandez; R G Foster
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Cysteine residues 110 and 187 are essential for the formation of correct structure in bovine rhodopsin.

Authors:  S S Karnik; T P Sakmar; H B Chen; H G Khorana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Switch in rod opsin gene expression in the European eel, Anguilla anguilla (L.).

Authors:  A J Hope; J C Partridge; P K Hayes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evolutionary changes of multiple visual pigment genes in the complete genome of Pacific bluefin tuna.

Authors:  Yoji Nakamura; Kazuki Mori; Kenji Saitoh; Kenshiro Oshima; Miyuki Mekuchi; Takuma Sugaya; Yuya Shigenobu; Nobuhiko Ojima; Shigeru Muta; Atushi Fujiwara; Motoshige Yasuike; Ichiro Oohara; Hideki Hirakawa; Vishwajit Sur Chowdhury; Takanori Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Nakajima; Motohiko Sano; Tokio Wada; Kosuke Tashiro; Kazuho Ikeo; Masahira Hattori; Satoru Kuhara; Takashi Gojobori; Kiyoshi Inouye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effects of temperature on sustained swimming performance and swimming kinematics of the chub mackerel Scomber japonicus.

Authors:  Kathryn A Dickson; Jeanine M Donley; Chugey Sepulveda; Lisa Bhoopat
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spectral sensitivity and photoresponse in the rock bream Oplegnathus fasciatus and their relationships with the absorption maximum of the photoreceptor.

Authors:  Jun-Chul Jang; Gyeong Eon Noh; Yeo-Reum Kim; Young-Moon Yu; Jong-Myoung Kim
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.794

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.