S Stordeur1, F Vrijens2, R Leroy3. 1. Belgian Health care Knowledge Centre, 55, boulevard du Jardin-Botanique, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Sabine.Stordeur@kce.fgov.be. 2. Belgian Health care Knowledge Centre, 55, boulevard du Jardin-Botanique, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: France.Vrijens@kce.fgov.be. 3. Belgian Health care Knowledge Centre, 55, boulevard du Jardin-Botanique, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Roos.Leroy@kce.fgov.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rare and/or complex cancers call for a very specific expertise and adequate infrastructure. In Belgium, every hospital with a programme in oncology can deliver care for adults with rare and/or complex cancer types, without having demonstrated a specific know-how to adequately manage these patients. Therefore, the Minister of Health ordered a scenario for the organisation of care for adults with rare and/or complex cancers, taking into account the current Belgian situation and relevant foreign experience. METHODS: Combined methods were used in this study: a literature review, the consultation of stakeholders, in depth discussions in 14 multidisciplinary groups leading to concrete proposals for several rare/complex cancers and the consultation of a panel of expert pathologists. RESULTS: The core recommendation is the set-up of shared care networks around reference centres, with multidisciplinary teams of recognised expertise in specific rare/complex cancers. The definition of minimum caseloads for hospitals and medical specialists, the evaluation of the quality of care, a model of diagnostic confirmation and the set-up of a national portal website which provides information on rare and/or complex cancers and reference centres are highly recommended. CONCLUSION: It is no longer practicable, efficient or ethical that every hospital or every practitioner continues to offer care for every rare/complex cancer. Improving the quality of rare/complex cancer care requires to concentrate expertise and sophisticated infrastructure in reference centres. Furthermore, the formation of networks between reference centres and peripheral centres will allow a delivery of care combining expertise and proximity. The next step is the translation of the recommendations into policy decisions. It is very well realised that this will take some courage and that a certain degree of resistance will have to be surmounted, but eventually, the best interest of the patient should prevail.
BACKGROUND: Rare and/or complex cancers call for a very specific expertise and adequate infrastructure. In Belgium, every hospital with a programme in oncology can deliver care for adults with rare and/or complex cancer types, without having demonstrated a specific know-how to adequately manage these patients. Therefore, the Minister of Health ordered a scenario for the organisation of care for adults with rare and/or complex cancers, taking into account the current Belgian situation and relevant foreign experience. METHODS: Combined methods were used in this study: a literature review, the consultation of stakeholders, in depth discussions in 14 multidisciplinary groups leading to concrete proposals for several rare/complex cancers and the consultation of a panel of expert pathologists. RESULTS: The core recommendation is the set-up of shared care networks around reference centres, with multidisciplinary teams of recognised expertise in specific rare/complex cancers. The definition of minimum caseloads for hospitals and medical specialists, the evaluation of the quality of care, a model of diagnostic confirmation and the set-up of a national portal website which provides information on rare and/or complex cancers and reference centres are highly recommended. CONCLUSION: It is no longer practicable, efficient or ethical that every hospital or every practitioner continues to offer care for every rare/complex cancer. Improving the quality of rare/complex cancer care requires to concentrate expertise and sophisticated infrastructure in reference centres. Furthermore, the formation of networks between reference centres and peripheral centres will allow a delivery of care combining expertise and proximity. The next step is the translation of the recommendations into policy decisions. It is very well realised that this will take some courage and that a certain degree of resistance will have to be surmounted, but eventually, the best interest of the patient should prevail.
Authors: Melissa De Regge; Kaat De Pourcq; Paul Gemmel; Carine Van de Voorde; Koen Van den Heede; Kristof Eeckloo Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 2.655