Literature DB >> 26745489

Supratentorial hemispheric ependymomas: an analysis of 109 adults for survival and prognostic factors.

Todd Hollon1, Vincent Nguyen2, Brandon W Smith1, Spencer Lewis1, Larry Junck3, Daniel A Orringer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Survival rates and prognostic factors for supratentorial hemispheric ependymomas have not been determined. The authors therefore designed a retrospective study to determine progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for hemispheric ependymomas. METHODS The study population consisted of 8 patients from our institution and 101 patients from the literature with disaggregated survival information (n = 109). Patient age, sex, tumor side, tumor location, extent of resection (EOR), tumor grade, postoperative chemotherapy, radiation, time to recurrence, and survival were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were completed to determine survival rates and prognostic factors. RESULTS Anaplastic histology/WHO Grade III tumors were identified in 62% of cases and correlated with older age. Three-, 5-, and 10-year PFS rates were 57%, 51%, and 42%, respectively. Three-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates were 77%, 71%, and 58%, respectively. EOR and tumor grade were identified on both Kaplan-Meier log-rank testing and univariate Cox proportional hazard models as prognostic for PFS and OS. Both EOR and tumor grade remained prognostic on multivariate analysis. Subtotal resection (STR) predicted a worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 4.764, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 4.216, p = 0.008). Subgroup survival analysis of patients with STR demonstrated a 5- and 10-year OS of 28% and 0%, respectively. WHO Grade III tumors also had worse PFS (HR 10.2, p = 0.004) and OS (HR 9.1, p = 0.035). Patients with WHO Grade III tumors demonstrated 5- and 10-year OS of 61% and 46%, respectively. Postoperative radiation was not prognostic for PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS A high incidence of anaplastic histology was found in hemispheric ependymomas and was associated with older age. EOR and tumor grade were prognostic factors for PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. STR or WHO Grade III pathology, or both, predicted worse overall prognosis in patients with hemispheric ependymoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOR = extent of resection; GTR = gross total resection; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; STR = subtotal resection; brain tumor; ependymoma; glioma; oncology; prognosis; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26745489     DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS151187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

Review 1.  Supratentorial pediatric cortical ependymomas: a comprehensive retrospective study.

Authors:  Qiguang Wang; Jian Cheng; Si Zhang; Qiang Li; Xuhui Hui; Yan Ju
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Surgical resection of fourth ventricular ependymomas: case series and technical nuances.

Authors:  Ethan A Winkler; Harjus Birk; Michael Safaee; John K Yue; John F Burke; Jennifer A Viner; Melike Pekmezci; Arie Perry; Manish K Aghi; Mitchel S Berger; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Maximizing safe resection of low- and high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of ependymal tumors.

Authors:  Roberta Rudà; Guido Reifenberger; Didier Frappaz; Stefan M Pfister; Anne Laprie; Thomas Santarius; Patrick Roth; Joerg Christian Tonn; Riccardo Soffietti; Michael Weller; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Intracranial ependymomas: The role of advanced neuroimaging in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Marco Varrassi; Flavia Cobianchi Bellisari; Maria Carmela De Donato; Emanuele Tommasino; Alessandra Di Sibio; Federico Bruno; Hambra Di Vitantonio; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 6.  Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates.

Authors:  Roberta Rudà; Francesco Bruno; Alessia Pellerino; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.945

7.  Prognostic Factors and Histopathological Features of Pediatric Intracranial Ependymomas: Nationwide Brain Tumor Registry-based Study of Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Sasaki; Yuji Uematsu; Junya Fukai; Shota Tanaka; Akitake Mukasa; Nobuhito Saito; Yoshitaka Narita; Naoyuki Nakao
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.036

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.