Literature DB >> 26745396

Is there any consistency between the microplastics found in the field and those used in laboratory experiments?

Nam Ngoc Phuong1, Aurore Zalouk-Vergnoux2, Laurence Poirier1, Abderrahmane Kamari1, Amélie Châtel1, Catherine Mouneyrac1, Fabienne Lagarde3.   

Abstract

The ubiquitous presence and persistency of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments are of particular concern since they represent an increasing threat to marine organisms and ecosystems. Great differences of concentrations and/or quantities in field samples have been observed depending on geographical location around the world. The main types reported have been polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene. The presence of MPs in marine wildlife has been shown in many studies focusing on ingestion and accumulation in different tissues, whereas studies of the biological effects of MPs in the field are scarce. If the nature and abundance/concentrations of MPs have not been systematically determined in field samples, this is due to the fact that the identification of MPs from environmental samples requires mastery and execution of several steps and techniques. For this reason and due to differences in sampling techniques and sample preparation, it remains difficult to compare the published studies. Most laboratory experiments have been performed with MP concentrations of a higher order of magnitude than those found in the field. Consequently, the ingestion and associated effects observed in exposed organisms have corresponded to great contaminant stress, which does not mimic the natural environment. Medium contaminations are produced with only one type of polymer of a precise sizes and homogenous shape whereas the MPs present in the field are known to be a mix of many types, sizes and shapes of plastic. Moreover, MPs originating in marine environments can be colonized by organisms and constitute the sorption support for many organic compounds present in environment that are not easily reproducible in laboratory. Determination of the mechanical and chemical effects of MPs on organisms is still a challenging area of research. Among the potential chemical effects it is necessary to differentiate those related to polymer properties from those due to the sorption/desorption of organic compounds.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological effects; Field samples; Ingestion; Laboratory exposures; Microplastics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26745396     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  25 in total

Review 1.  Occurrence, sources, human health impacts and mitigation of microplastic pollution.

Authors:  Samaneh Karbalaei; Parichehr Hanachi; Tony R Walker; Matthew Cole
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  On Some Possible Ramifications of the "Microplastics in Fish" Case.

Authors:  Bor Luen Tang
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Microplastic exposure interacts with habitat degradation to affect behaviour and survival of juvenile fish in the field.

Authors:  Mark I McCormick; Douglas P Chivers; Maud C O Ferrari; Makeely I Blandford; Gerrit B Nanninga; Celia Richardson; Eric P Fakan; George Vamvounis; Alexandra M Gulizia; Bridie J M Allan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

5.  Microplastics disrupt hermit crab shell selection.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Charlotte Mullens; Emily J Bethell; Eoghan M Cunningham; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Quantification and characterization of microplastics in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis): protocol setup and preliminary data on the contamination of the French Atlantic coast.

Authors:  Nam Ngoc Phuong; Aurore Zalouk-Vergnoux; Abderrahmane Kamari; Catherine Mouneyrac; Frederic Amiard; Laurence Poirier; Fabienne Lagarde
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Abundance and distribution of microplastics within surface sediments of a key shellfish growing region of Canada.

Authors:  T N Kazmiruk; V D Kazmiruk; L I Bendell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do microplastic particles affect Daphnia magna at the morphological, life history and molecular level?

Authors:  Hannes K Imhof; Jakub Rusek; Michaela Thiel; Justyna Wolinska; Christian Laforsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill.

Authors:  Amanda L Dawson; So Kawaguchi; Catherine K King; Kathy A Townsend; Robert King; Wilhelmina M Huston; Susan M Bengtson Nash
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A novel method for preparing microplastic fibers.

Authors:  Matthew Cole
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.