Literature DB >> 26745288

A knowledge-based approach to estimating the magnitude and spatial patterns of potential threats to soil biodiversity.

Alberto Orgiazzi1, Panos Panagos2, Yusuf Yigini2, Martha B Dunbar2, Ciro Gardi3, Luca Montanarella2, Cristiano Ballabio2.   

Abstract

Because of the increasing pressures exerted on soil, below-ground life is under threat. Knowledge-based rankings of potential threats to different components of soil biodiversity were developed in order to assess the spatial distribution of threats on a European scale. A list of 13 potential threats to soil biodiversity was proposed to experts with different backgrounds in order to assess the potential for three major components of soil biodiversity: soil microorganisms, fauna, and biological functions. This approach allowed us to obtain knowledge-based rankings of threats. These classifications formed the basis for the development of indices through an additive aggregation model that, along with ad-hoc proxies for each pressure, allowed us to preliminarily assess the spatial patterns of potential threats. Intensive exploitation was identified as the highest pressure. In contrast, the use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture was considered as the threat with least potential. The potential impact of climate change showed the highest uncertainty. Fourteen out of the 27 considered countries have more than 40% of their soils with moderate-high to high potential risk for all three components of soil biodiversity. Arable soils are the most exposed to pressures. Soils within the boreal biogeographic region showed the lowest risk potential. The majority of soils at risk are outside the boundaries of protected areas. First maps of risks to three components of soil biodiversity based on the current scientific knowledge were developed. Despite the intrinsic limits of knowledge-based assessments, a remarkable potential risk to soil biodiversity was observed. Guidelines to preliminarily identify and circumscribe soils potentially at risk are provided. This approach may be used in future research to assess threat at both local and global scale and identify areas of possible risk and, subsequently, design appropriate strategies for monitoring and protection of soil biota.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Land-use planning; Risk assessment; Soil biodiversity; Soil biota conservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26745288     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  The impact of urban pollution on metal contamination of selected forest pockets in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Anne-Liese Krüger; Reinette Snyman; James Odendaal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Regard and protect ground-nesting pollinators as part of soil biodiversity.

Authors:  Stefanie Christmann
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.105

3.  Age-related environmental gradients influence invertebrate distribution in the Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica.

Authors:  Paul Czechowski; Duanne White; Laurence Clarke; Alan McKay; Alan Cooper; Mark I Stevens
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Soil Microbiomes in Apple Orchards Are Influenced by the Type of Agricultural Management but Never Match the Complexity and Connectivity of a Semi-natural Benchmark.

Authors:  Eva Hulsmans; Gerrit Peeters; Olivier Honnay
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Drivers and trends of global soil microbial carbon over two decades.

Authors:  Guillaume Patoine; Nico Eisenhauer; Simone Cesarz; Helen R P Phillips; Xiaofeng Xu; Lihua Zhang; Carlos A Guerra
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  The Physiological Response of Different Brook Willow (Salix acmophylla Boiss.) Ecotypes to Salinity.

Authors:  Emily Palm; Joshua D Klein; Stefano Mancuso; Werther Guidi Nissim
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.