Literature DB >> 26745251

Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials, neuron-specific enolase, and S100 for short-term outcome in ischemic stroke.

Walter F Haupt1, Ghesal Chopan2, Jan Sobesky3, Wei-Chi Liu2, Christian Dohmen4.   

Abstract

To predict short-term outcome in acute ischemic stroke, we analyzed somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and biochemical parameters [neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 protein] in a prospective study with serial measurement. In 31 patients with 1st middle cerebral artery infarction, serum NSE and S100 protein were measured daily between days 1 and 6 poststroke. The N20 and N70 components of the SEP (SEP20 and SEP70) were determined on days 1 and 6. SEP and biochemical markers in stroke patients were compared with a control group. Short-term outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at days 7-10 and was dichotomized between good (mRS 0-2) and poor (mRS ≥3) outcome. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were high at day 1 for SEP (SEP20: 100% for both; SEP70: 93 and 88%, respectively) compared with lower values for NSE (67 and 50%) and S100 (23 and 57%). In contrast, S100 showed the highest sensitivity at day 1 with 77% compared with a relatively low sensitivity of NSE (31%) and SEP (SEP20: 35%, SEP70: 47%). The biochemical markers showed an improving sensitivity over time with best values (>90%) between days 3 and 4 at the expense of a lower specificity. Specificity and PPV of SEP on day 6 was still 100% with sensitivity increasing up to 53% (SEP20) and 60% (SEP70). SEP could early differentiate between good and poor outcome and reliably predict poor outcome. Since biochemical markers and SEP complement each other in the prognosis of stroke, a combined application of these markers seems promising.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSE; S100; SEP; ischemic stroke; outcome; prediction; somatosensory evoked potentials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26745251      PMCID: PMC4808083          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01012.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of serum S-100 protein levels following stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  J W Elting; A E de Jager; A W Teelken; M J Schaaf; N M Maurits; J van der Naalt; C T Sibinga; G A Sulter; J De Keyser
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Evaluation of serum S100B as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome and infarct volume in acute middle cerebral artery infarction.

Authors:  Christian Foerch; Oliver C Singer; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Helmuth Steinmetz; Matthias Sitzer
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2005-07

4.  Serial measurement of interleukin-6, transforming growth factor-beta, and S-100 protein in patients with acute stroke.

Authors:  J S Kim; S S Yoon; Y H Kim; J S Ryu
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Serial evoked potentials and outcome in cerebrovascular critical care patients.

Authors:  W F Haupt; C Birkmann; M Halber
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 6.  Neuron-specific enolase as a marker for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nishant Anand; Latha G Stead
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Prognostic value of median and tibial somatosensory evoked potentials in acute stroke.

Authors:  Plamen Tzvetanov; Rossen T Rousseff; Penka Atanassova
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  B D Zeman; C Yiannikas
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Neuron-specific enolase concentrations in blood as a prognostic parameter in cerebrovascular diseases.

Authors:  H Schaarschmidt; H W Prange; H Reiber
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Release of neurobiochemical markers of brain damage is related to the neurovascular status on admission and the site of arterial occlusion in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Michael T Wunderlich; Claus-W Wallesch; Michael Goertler
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Treatments in Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Aldo Bonaventura; Luca Liberale; Alessandra Vecchié; Matteo Casula; Federico Carbone; Franco Dallegri; Fabrizio Montecucco
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Function and mechanism of microRNA-210 in acute cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Yuezhan Zhang; Feng Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Investigating the Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation on EEG in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Samran Navid; Imran Khan Niazi; Dina Lelic; Rasmus Bach Nedergaard; Kelly Holt; Imran Amjad; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-27

4.  Evidence for the Rapid and Divergent Evolution of Mycoplasmas: Structural and Phylogenetic Analysis of Enolases.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Lin Zhao; Rong Gan; Zhixin Feng; Chenxi Cui; Xing Xie; Fei Hao; Zhenzhen Zhang; Li Wang; Tingting Ran; Weiwu Wang; Shuijun Zhang; Yufeng Li; Wei Zhang; Maoda Pang; Qiyan Xiong; Guoqing Shao
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Prediction of Outcome After Endovascular Embolectomy in Anterior Circulation Stroke Using Biomarkers.

Authors:  Fani Pujol-Calderón; Henrik Zetterberg; Erik Portelius; Pia Löwhagen Hendén; Alexandros Rentzos; Jan-Erik Karlsson; Kina Höglund; Kaj Blennow; Lars E Rosengren
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.829

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.