| Literature DB >> 26744606 |
Robert P Gunsalus1, Lauren E Cook2, Bryan Crable3, Lars Rohlin2, Erin McDonald2, Housna Mouttaki4, Jessica R Sieber3, Nicole Poweleit2, Hong Zhou2, Alla L Lapidus5, Hajnalka Erzsebet Daligault6, Miriam Land7, Paul Gilna7, Natalia Ivanova8, Nikos Kyrpides9, David E Culley10, Michael J McInerney3.
Abstract
Methanospirillum hungatei strain JF1 (DSM 864) is a methane-producing archaeon and is the type species of the genus Methanospirillum, which belongs to the family Methanospirillaceae within the order Methanomicrobiales. Its genome was selected for sequencing due to its ability to utilize hydrogen and carbon dioxide and/or formate as a sole source of energy. Ecologically, M. hungatei functions as the hydrogen- and/or formate-using partner with many species of syntrophic bacteria. Its morphology is distinct from other methanogens with the ability to form long chains of cells (up to 100 μm in length), which are enclosed within a sheath-like structure, and terminal cells with polar flagella. The genome of M. hungatei strain JF1 is the first completely sequenced genome of the family Methanospirillaceae, and it has a circular genome of 3,544,738 bp containing 3,239 protein coding and 68 RNA genes. The large genome of M. hungatei JF1 suggests the presence of unrecognized biochemical/physiological properties that likely extend to the other Methanospirillaceae and include the ability to form the unusual sheath-like structure and to successfully interact with syntrophic bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic; Formate; Hydrogen; Methangenic archaea; Methanomicrobiales; Motile; Syntrophic partnerships
Year: 2016 PMID: 26744606 PMCID: PMC4704411 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0124-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Fig. 1Electron micrograph of M. hungatei strain JF1 cells and associated sheath structure. Scale bar corresponds to 100 nm
Classification and features of Methanospirillum hungatei strain JF1 according to MIGS recommendations [45] published by the genomic standards consortium [46] and the names for life database [47]
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence codea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum | TAS [ | ||
| Class | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Type strain JF-1 | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | Negative | TAS [ | |
| Cell shape | Curved rods 0.5 μM x 7.4 μM | TAS [ | |
| Motility | Motile | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | Non-sporulating | TAS [ | |
| Temperature range | 30 °C-40 °C | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 37 °C | TAS [ | |
| pH range; Optimum | 6.5–10; 6.6–7.4 | TAS [ | |
| Carbon source | Carbon dioxide, formate, acetate | TAS [ | |
| Energy source | Hydrogen, formate | TAS [ | |
| Terminal electron receptor | Carbon dioxide | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | Anaerobic sediments, sewage digesters | TAS [ |
| MIGS-6.3 | Salinity | Fresh to brackish water | TAS [ |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | Strict anaerobe | TAS [ |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | Syntrophic | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | Non-pathogen | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | USA, Urbana, IL | TAS [ |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection time | 1972 | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | 40.109°N | NAS |
| MIGS-4.2 | Longitude | 88.204°W | NAS |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | 222 m | TAS [ |
These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [52]
IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence)
aEvidence codes
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Methanosprillulm hungatei strain JF1 relative to other type strains within the Methanomicrobiales. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [43]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3033.8513) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 12 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 789 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [44]
Project information
| MIGS ID | Property | Term |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS 31 | Finishing quality | Finished |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | 3, 8, 14 kb |
| MIGS 29 | Sequencing platforms | Sanger |
| MIGS 31.2 | Fold coverage | 14.5X |
| MIGS 30 | Assemblers | PGA |
| MIGS 32 | Gene calling method | Prodical GenePRIMP |
| Locus Tag | Mhun_0000 | |
| Genbank ID | CP000254 | |
| GenBank Date of Release | March 1, 2006 | |
| GOLD ID | Gc00350 | |
| BIOPROJECT | PRJNA13015 | |
| MIGS 13 | Source Material Identifier | DSM 864 T |
| Project relevance | Carbon cycle, energy production, bioreactors |
Genome statistics
| Attribute | Value | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 3,544,738 | 100.00 |
| DNA coding (bp) | 3,142,074 | 88.94 |
| DNA G + C (bp) | 1,600,415 | 45.15 |
| DNA scaffolds | 1 | 100.00 |
| Total genes | 3,307 | 100.00 |
| Protein coding genes | 3,239 | 97.94 |
| RNA genes | 68 | 2.06 |
| Pseudo genes | 99 | 2.99 |
| Genes in internal clusters | 2172 | 65.68 |
| Genes with function prediction | 2,018 | 61.02 |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 1872 | 56.61 |
| Genes with Pfam domains | 2577 | 77.93 |
| Genes with signal peptides | 101 | 3.05 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 762 | 23.04 |
| CRISPR repeats | 6 |
Fig. 3Graphic circular map of the M. hungatei JF1 chromosome. The concentric circles from outside to inside indicate: genes on the forward strand, genes on the reverse strand, RNA genes (tRNA’s green, .rRNA’s red, other RNA’s black), GC content, and GC skew
Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
| Code | Value | % age | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 180 | 8.65 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 0.00 | RNA processing and modification | |
| K | 84 | 4.03 | Transcription |
| L | 82 | 3.94 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 8 | 0.38 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 16 | 0.77 | Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| V | 53 | 2.55 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 154 | 7.4 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 85 | 4.08 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
| N | 54 | 2.59 | Cell motility |
| U | 17 | 0.82 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| O | 89 | 4.27 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 186 | 8.93 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 59 | 2.83 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 165 | 7.93 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 62 | 2.98 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 162 | 7.78 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 31 | 1.49 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 147 | 7.06 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 16 | 0.77 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 217 | 10.42 | General function prediction only |
| S | 160 | 7.68 | Function unknown |
| - | 1435 | 43.39 | Not in COGs |
The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome
Fig. 4Overview of central metabolism in M. hungatei strain JF1. The pathway for methane formation from hydrogen and formate is shown in black with key steps shown with gene/enzyme designations. Membrane proteins involved in energy transduction electron transport, and ion/solute translocation are arranged along the cytoplasmic membrane: archaeal ATP synthase, Aha; formate dehydrogenases, Fdh; hydrogenases (Mbh, Ech, Ehr, Eha Frh); formyl-methanofuran dehydrogenase, Fmd, Fwd; methenyl–H4MPT tetrahydromethanopterin cyclohydrolyase, Mch; formylMFR:tetrahydromethanopterin formyl transferase, Ftr; methylene–H4MPT dehydrogenase, Mtd; methylene–H4MPT reductase, Mer; H4MPT S-methyltransferase (Mtr; methyl-CoM reductasem Mcr; and CoM-S-S-CoB heterodisulfide reductase, Hdr