S Galler1, J-P Stellmann2, K L Young2, D Kutzner3, C Heesen2, J Fiehler3, S Siemonsen4. 1. From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (S.G., D.K., J.F., S.S.) s.galler@uke.de. 2. Neurology (J.-P.S., K.L.Y., C.H.) the Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (J.-P.S., K.L.Y., C.H., S.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (S.G., D.K., J.F., S.S.). 4. From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (S.G., D.K., J.F., S.S.) the Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (J.-P.S., K.L.Y., C.H., S.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identification of lesions in specific locations gains importance in multiple sclerosis imaging diagnostic criteria. In clinical routine, axial scans are usually exclusively obtained to depict the cervical spinal cord or used to confirm suspected lesions on sagittal scans. We sought to evaluate the detection rate for MS lesions on axial T2WI scans with full spinal cord coverage in comparison with sagittal scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients with definite or suspected MS underwent an MR imaging examination including 3-mm sagittal and 3.5-mm axial T2-weighted images with full spinal cord coverage. T2WI lesions were identified on axial and sagittal scans independently by 2 raters. Axial diameter, craniocaudal extension, lesion intensity, and location were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine of 509 (88.2%) lesions were detected on axial and 337/509 (66.2%) on sagittal scans. Only 277/449 (61.7%) axial lesions were also detected on sagittal images. The number of lesions visible on sagittal and axial images was dependent on the axial lesion diameter (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Axial T2WI scans with full spinal cord coverage showed 22% more lesions in patients with MS in comparison with sagittal scans, especially for lesions with small axial diameters. We suggest including biplanar spinal MR imaging with full spinal cord coverage for lesion detection in MS in clinical routine and for clinical studies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identification of lesions in specific locations gains importance in multiple sclerosis imaging diagnostic criteria. In clinical routine, axial scans are usually exclusively obtained to depict the cervical spinal cord or used to confirm suspected lesions on sagittal scans. We sought to evaluate the detection rate for MS lesions on axial T2WI scans with full spinal cord coverage in comparison with sagittal scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients with definite or suspected MS underwent an MR imaging examination including 3-mm sagittal and 3.5-mm axial T2-weighted images with full spinal cord coverage. T2WI lesions were identified on axial and sagittal scans independently by 2 raters. Axial diameter, craniocaudal extension, lesion intensity, and location were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine of 509 (88.2%) lesions were detected on axial and 337/509 (66.2%) on sagittal scans. Only 277/449 (61.7%) axial lesions were also detected on sagittal images. The number of lesions visible on sagittal and axial images was dependent on the axial lesion diameter (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Axial T2WI scans with full spinal cord coverage showed 22% more lesions in patients with MS in comparison with sagittal scans, especially for lesions with small axial diameters. We suggest including biplanar spinal MR imaging with full spinal cord coverage for lesion detection in MS in clinical routine and for clinical studies.
Authors: D Kidd; J W Thorpe; A J Thompson; B E Kendall; I F Moseley; D G MacManus; W I McDonald; D H Miller Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J C J Bot; F Barkhof; C H Polman; G J Lycklama à Nijeholt; V de Groot; E Bergers; H J Ader; J A Castelijns Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-01-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: E Raz; M Bester; E E Sigmund; A Tabesh; J S Babb; H Jaggi; J Helpern; R J Mitnick; M Inglese Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Michael O Breckwoldt; Johann Gradl; Stefan Hähnel; Thomas Hielscher; Brigitte Wildemann; Ricarda Diem; Michael Platten; Wolfgang Wick; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Matthias Bussas; Malek El Husseini; Laura Harabacz; Viktor Pineker; Sophia Grahl; Viola Pongratz; Achim Berthele; Isabelle Riederer; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Hemmer; Jan S Kirschke; Mark Mühlau Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 4.891