| Literature DB >> 26744291 |
Jolanta Dadoniene1,2,3, Marius Miglinas4,5, Dalia Miltiniene6,7,8, Donatas Vajauskas9,10, Dmitrij Seinin11, Petras Butenas12, Tomas Kacergius13.
Abstract
Tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome characterised by severe hypophosphataemia and osteomalacia, with renal phosphate wasting that occurs in association with tumour. The epidemiology likewise aetiology is not known. The clinical presentation of TIO includes bone fractures, bone and muscular pains, and sometimes height and weight loss. TIO may be associated with mesenchymal tumours which may be benign or malignant in rare cases. Mesenchymal tumour itself may be related to fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), which is responsible for hypophosphataemia and phosphaturia occurring in this paraneoplastic syndrome. Hypophosphataemia, phosphaturia and elevated alkaline phosphatase are the main laboratory readings that may lead to more precise investigations and better diagnosis. Finding the tumour can be a major diagnostic challenge and may involve total body magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and scintigraphy using radiolabelled somatostatin analogue. The treatment of choice for TIO is resection of a tumour with a wide margin to insure complete tumour removal, as recurrences of these tumours have been reported. We provide here an overview on the current available TIO case reports and review the best practices that may lead to earlier recognition of TIO and the subsequent treatment thereof, even though biochemical background and the long-term prognosis of the disease are not well understood. This review also includes a 4-year-long history of a patient that featured muscular pains, weakness and multiple stress fractures localised in the hips and vertebra with subsequent recovery after tumour resection. Because the occurrence of such a condition is rare, it may take years to correctly diagnose the disease, as is reported in this case report.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26744291 PMCID: PMC4705745 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0763-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
The sequence of laboratory findings from the beginning of disease
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence of analysis | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 1st | 2nd | (1 year after hip arthroplasty) | |
| Laboratory findings | |||||||||
| Phosphate (0.87–1.45 mmol/l) | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 1.19 | |||||
| 24 h urine sample phosphate (12.9–42.0 mmol/24 h) | 26.49 | 17.97 | %TPR = 90.52a | ||||||
| Calcium (2.15–2.50 mmol/l) | 2.25 | 2.37 | 2.42 | 2.40 | 2.48 | ||||
| Ionised calcium (1.05–1.30 mmol/l) | 1.12 | 1.16 | 1.30 | 1.09 | |||||
| Alkaline phosphatase (40–150 U/l) | 248 | 274 | 310 | 257.25 | 297.7 | 319.19 | 279 | 85.97 | |
| 25-OH vitamin D (75–100 nmol/l) | 78.4 | 54.68 | 47.93 | 77.70 | 85.83 | 72.3 | 44.42 | ||
| Parathyroid hormone (1.6–7.2 pmol/l) | 6.07 | 8.10 | 19.9 | 12.01 | |||||
| FGF-23 26–110 U/l | 589 | 104 (measured 3 months after hip arthroplasty) | |||||||
a%TPR = 90.52—calculated according to the formula: 100 × (1 − ((urine phosphate/urine creatinine) × (serum creatinine/serum phosphate))). 100 × (1 − ((45.06/28.521) × (0.07/1.17))) and was found to be in normal range between 85 and 95 %. Numbers are entered in millimoles per liter
Fig. 1a Whole body bone scintigraphy 99mTc-MDP. Moderate uptake in the right shoulder, on both sides of the ribs due to osteoblastic lesions. Reduces radiotracer uptake in right femoral head (long arrow). b 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT of the pelvis. Reduced radiotracer uptake in right femur head, corresponding sclerotic lesion on CT (long arrow) (year 2011)
Fig. 2a The posture before the right hip endoprosthesis operation and tumour extirpation. The patient has given the written consent for his medical findings and photos to be published. b 99mTc-Tektrotyd whole body scintigraphy. Intensive, focal radiotracer uptake in right femur head ( red markers around) (year 2014)
Fig. 3a 99mTc-Tektrotyd SPECT /CT of a pelvis. Focal, intensive radio tracer uptake in right femoral head (long arrow) and b corresponding sclerotic lesion on CT (long arrow) (year 2014)
Fig. 4Osteosclerotic tumour in the right femur head revealed during the whole body computerised tomography (year 2014)
Fig. 5Histologic examination of the specimen revealed a hypercellular tumour composed of spindle-shaped cells in fibromyxoid matrix, with a hemangiopericytoma-like pattern (a). Tumour cells had clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm, nuclei were oval or elongated, of monomorphic appearance, with no signs of atypia. Mitotic figures were rarely seen. Surrounding bone trabeculae were irregular in size and shape with wide osteoid seams and foci of hyaline cartilage, showing enchondral ossification (b, c). The tumour cells were strongly and diffusely positive with vimentin (d) but exhibited no reactivity with PanCK, SMA, CD34, CD10 and D2-40 (year 2014)
Fig. 6Conventional radiography of the spine after 1 year after tumour resection showed permanent and nonreversible spine deformation due to the old compressions from Th3 to Th11 with no evidence of new compression fractures (year 2015)