Literature DB >> 26743978

[Distribution and Scattering of APHAB Answers Before and After Hearing Aid Fitting].

J Löhler1, B Akcicek1, B Wollenberg2, R Schönweiler3.   

Abstract

Objective: Questionnaires are an important diagnostic elements in audiology. In Germany the APHAB is regularly used for hearing aid fitting. This study is investigating whether there are any specific questions which are answered more rarely by the subjects than other and whether inverted questions have any influence to this.
Methods: Between April 2013 and August 2015 the number of 23 557 APHAB forms by 10 associations of statutory health insurance registered physicians have been collected and evaluated. For all questions the frequency of answers before and after hearing aid fitting have been determined.
Results: For the EC scale there was one group of patients without hearing aid which a lot of problems of hearing and a second without. For the BN and RV subscale the majority of the patients addresses problems of understanding. For the AV scale no specific kind of problems found has been found. After successful hearing aid fitting problems of understanding for EC, BN, and RV subscale were reduced on average, for the AV scale no relevant change could be observed. Except for the numbers 11, 18, and 21 all APHAB questions were answered by 93-94% by all subjects. The questions number 11 and 18 were answered by 92%, question number 21 by 87%. Some questions have a similar tendency in deviation from the average (1, 3, 13, 16, and 17). Conclusions: Inverted questions have no influence to the frequency of answers in APHAB questions. The 3 questions which are answered more rarely are describing hearing situations in cinemas, theatres, and at church. Presumably, this hearing situations are not so common for most patients than the other described by the APHAB. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26743978     DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-107561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  9 in total

1.  [Subjective improvement of hearing through cochlear implantation].

Authors:  N Volleth; A Hast; E K Lehmann; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  [Everyday relevance of APHAB questions : Influence on answer frequency].

Authors:  S Storz; R Schönweiler; B Wollenberg; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Dependency of APHAB score in the ECu subscale on age, gender and subjective hearing loss : Hearing aid fitting in two subjective hearing loss groups].

Authors:  J Löhler; O Wegner; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).

Authors:  Jan Löhler; F Gräbner; B Wollenberg; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].

Authors:  Jan Löhler; Mathias Sippel; Leif Erik Walther; Rainer Schönweiler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.057

9.  [Possibilities to predict the success of an individual hearing aid fitting using the APHAB].

Authors:  Max Thomas; Rainer Schönweiler; Jan Löhler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.057

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.