Tyler Hyungtaek Rim1, Jinu Han1, Yoon Seong Choi1, Seung-sik Hwang1, Christopher Seungkyu Lee1, Sung Chul Lee1, Sung Soo Kim2. 1. From the Department of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Institute of Vision Research (T.H.R., J.H., C.S.L., S.C.L., S.S.K.), Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital (Y.S.C.), and Yonsei Healthcare Big Data Based Knowledge Integration System Research Center and Institute of Convergence Science (S.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Epidemiology, Incheon, South Korea (S.-s.H.). 2. From the Department of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Institute of Vision Research (T.H.R., J.H., C.S.L., S.C.L., S.S.K.), Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital (Y.S.C.), and Yonsei Healthcare Big Data Based Knowledge Integration System Research Center and Institute of Convergence Science (S.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Epidemiology, Incheon, South Korea (S.-s.H.). semekim@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the risk of subsequent stroke development after retinal artery occlusion (RAO). METHODS: National registry data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, comprised 1 025 340 random subjects. Patients diagnosed with RAO in 2002 and 2003 were excluded. The RAO group was composed of patients with an initial diagnosis of either central or other RAO between January 2004 and December 2013 (n=401). The comparison group was composed of randomly selected patients (5 per RAO patient; n=2003) who were matched to the RAO group according to sociodemographic factors and year of RAO diagnosis. Each sampled patient was tracked until 2013. Cox proportional hazard regression was used. RESULTS: Stroke occurred in 15.0% of the RAO group and in 8.0% of the comparison group (P < 0.001). RAO was associated with an increased risk of stroke occurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.41). The magnitude of the RAO effect for stroke was larger among younger adults aged <65 years (hazard ratio, 3.11) than older adults aged ≥65 years (hazard ratio, 1.26). However, the risk of subsequent stroke was significantly increased in older adults aged ≥65 years at the 4-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.48). CONCLUSIONS: RAO was significantly associated with subsequent stroke after adjusting for comorbidities and sociodemographic factors. These findings are limited by uncontrolled confounding factors and need to be replicated by other observational studies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the risk of subsequent stroke development after retinal artery occlusion (RAO). METHODS: National registry data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, comprised 1 025 340 random subjects. Patients diagnosed with RAO in 2002 and 2003 were excluded. The RAO group was composed of patients with an initial diagnosis of either central or other RAO between January 2004 and December 2013 (n=401). The comparison group was composed of randomly selected patients (5 per RAO patient; n=2003) who were matched to the RAO group according to sociodemographic factors and year of RAO diagnosis. Each sampled patient was tracked until 2013. Cox proportional hazard regression was used. RESULTS:Stroke occurred in 15.0% of the RAO group and in 8.0% of the comparison group (P < 0.001). RAO was associated with an increased risk of stroke occurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.41). The magnitude of the RAO effect for stroke was larger among younger adults aged <65 years (hazard ratio, 3.11) than older adults aged ≥65 years (hazard ratio, 1.26). However, the risk of subsequent stroke was significantly increased in older adults aged ≥65 years at the 4-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.48). CONCLUSIONS: RAO was significantly associated with subsequent stroke after adjusting for comorbidities and sociodemographic factors. These findings are limited by uncontrolled confounding factors and need to be replicated by other observational studies.
Authors: Tyler Calway; Daniel S Rubin; Heather E Moss; Charlotte E Joslin; Ankit I Mehta; Steven Roth Journal: J Neuroophthalmol Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Tyler Calway; Daniel S Rubin; Heather E Moss; Charlotte E Joslin; Katharina Beckmann; Steven Roth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tahreem A Mir; Ahmad Z Arham; Wei Fang; Fahad Alqahtani; Mohamad Alkhouli; Julia Gallo; David M Hinkle Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-26 Impact factor: 5.258