Literature DB >> 26742710

Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients.

Wolfgang P Fendler1, Hanna Lechner2, Andrei Todica2, Karolin J Paprottka3, Philipp M Paprottka3, Tobias F Jakobs4, Marlies Michl5, Peter Bartenstein6, Sebastian Lehner2, Alexander R Haug7.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The present study evaluated safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for (90)Y-yttrium microsphere radioembolization of unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer.
METHODS: Eighty-one patients were treated with radioembolization. Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum tests until 3 d after radioembolization; late toxicity was evaluated until 12 wk after radioembolization. Overall survival and response according to (18)F-FDG PET (>30% decrease of tracer uptake) and CA15-3 serum level (any decline) were recorded. Pretherapeutic characteristics, including pretreatment history, liver function tests, and PET/CT parameters, were assessed by univariate and subsequent multivariate Cox regression for predicting patient survival.
RESULTS: A toxicity grade of 3 or more based on clinical symptoms, bilirubin, ulcer, pancreatitis, ascites, or radioembolization-induced liver disease occurred in 10% or less of patients. Two patients eventually died from radioembolization-induced liver disease. Sequential lobar treatment and absence of prior angiosuppressive therapy were both associated with a lower rate of serious adverse events. On the basis of PET/CA15-3 criteria, 52/61% of patients responded to treatment. Median overall survival after radioembolization was 35 wk (interquartile range, 41 wk). Pretherapeutic tumor burden of the liver greater than 50% or more (P< 0.001; hazard ratio, 5.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-13.34) and a transaminase toxicity grade of 2 or more (P= 0.009; hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.80) independently predicted short survival.
CONCLUSION: Radioembolization for breast cancer liver metastases shows encouraging local response rates with low incidence of serious adverse events, especially in those patients with sequential lobar treatment or without prior angiosuppressive therapy. High hepatic tumor burden and liver transaminase levels at baseline indicate poor outcome.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; hepatic metastases; radioembolization; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26742710     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

Review 1.  Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases from Breast and Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Ramona Gupta; Neil Sheth; Andrew C Gordon; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Pre-therapeutic factors for predicting survival after radioembolization: a single-center experience in 389 patients.

Authors:  K J Paprottka; F Schoeppe; M Ingrisch; J Rübenthaler; N N Sommer; E De Toni; H Ilhan; M Zacherl; A Todica; P M Paprottka
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ariel N Liberchuk; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: An Evolution Toward Precision Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Making the Case: Intra-arterial Therapy for Less Common Metastases.

Authors:  Andrew C Gordon; Omar M Uddin; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Intra-Arterial Therapies for Liver Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  B M Aarts; F M Gómez Muñoz; H Wildiers; V O Dezentjé; T R Baetens; W Schats; M Lopez-Yurda; R C Dresen; B J de Wit-van der Veen; C M Deroose; G Maleux; R G H Beets-Tan; E G Klompenhouwer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Safety of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 microspheres combined with systemic anticancer agents: expert consensus.

Authors:  Andrew Kennedy; Daniel B Brown; Jonas Feilchenfeldt; John Marshall; Harpreet Wasan; Marwan Fakih; Peter Gibbs; Alexander Knuth; Bruno Sangro; Michael C Soulen; Gianfranco Pittari; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-12

8.  Incidence and risk factors for sustained hepatic function toxicity 6 months after radioembolization: analysis of the radiation-emitting sir-spheres in non-resectable liver tumor (RESIN) registry.

Authors:  Daniel Brown; Henry Krebs; Jayson Brower; Ryan O'Hara; Eric Wang; Kirubahara Vaheesan; Liping Du; Lea Matsuoka; Donna D'Souza; Daniel Y Sze; Jafar Golzarian; Ripal Gandhi; Andrew Kennedy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

9.  Relationship of radiation dose to efficacy of radioembolization of liver metastasis from breast cancer.

Authors:  Fourat Ridouani; Mohamed M Soliman; Ryan W England; Meier Hsu; Chaya S Moskowitz; Raphael Doustaly; Constantinos T Sofocleous; F Edward Boas; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Successful treatment with yttrium-90 microspheres in a metastatic breast cancer patient and sclerosing cholangitis.

Authors:  Aurélie Louvet; Cédric van Marcke; Philippe D'Abadie; Emmanuel Seront
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.