Literature DB >> 26741707

Disease-Specific Trends of Comorbidity Coding and Implications for Risk Adjustment in Hospital Administrative Data.

Ulrike Nimptsch1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in comorbidity coding after the introduction of diagnosis related groups (DRGs) based prospective payment and whether trends differ regarding specific comorbidities. DATA SOURCES: Nationwide administrative data (DRG statistics) from German acute care hospitals from 2005 to 2012. STUDY
DESIGN: Observational study to analyze trends in comorbidity coding in patients hospitalized for common primary diseases and the effects on comorbidity-related risk of in-hospital death. EXTRACTION
METHODS: Comorbidity coding was operationalized by Elixhauser diagnosis groups. The analyses focused on adult patients hospitalized for the primary diseases of heart failure, stroke, and pneumonia, as well as hip fracture. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: When focusing the total frequency of diagnosis groups per record, an increase in depth of coding was observed. Between-hospital variations in depth of coding were present throughout the observation period. Specific comorbidity increases were observed in 15 of the 31 diagnosis groups, and decreases in comorbidity were observed for 11 groups. In patients hospitalized for heart failure, shifts of comorbidity-related risk of in-hospital death occurred in nine diagnosis groups, in which eight groups were directed toward the null.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity-adjusted outcomes in longitudinal administrative data analyses may be biased by nonconstant risk over time, changes in completeness of coding, and between-hospital variations in coding. Accounting for such issues is important when the respective observation period coincides with changes in the reimbursement system or other conditions that are likely to alter clinical coding practice. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elixhauser diagnosis groups; Risk adjustment; administrative data; coding practice; comorbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26741707      PMCID: PMC4874831          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  21 in total

1.  Coding response to a case-mix measurement system based on multiple diagnoses.

Authors:  Colin Preyra
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  How much change in the case mix index is DRG creep?

Authors:  G M Carter; J P Newhouse; D A Relles
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy.

Authors:  Jon Nicholl
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Impact of Medicare's payment policy on mediastinitis following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in US hospitals.

Authors:  Michael S Calderwood; Ken Kleinman; Stephen B Soumerai; Robert Jin; Charlene Gay; Richard Platt; William Kassler; Donald A Goldmann; Ashish K Jha; Grace M Lee
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system.

Authors:  D C Hsia; W M Krushat; A B Fagan; J A Tebbutt; R P Kusserow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Hypothyroidism in the elderly: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Peter Laurberg; Stig Andersen; Inge Bülow Pedersen; Allan Carlé
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Systolic blood pressure at admission, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Authors:  Mihai Gheorghiade; William T Abraham; Nancy M Albert; Barry H Greenberg; Christopher M O'Connor; Lilin She; Wendy Gattis Stough; Clyde W Yancy; James B Young; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Differences in the implementation of diagnosis-related groups across clinical departments: a German hospital case study.

Authors:  Hans-Gerd Ridder; Vanessa Doege; Susanne Martini
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Systematic review: the global incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  J J Y Sung; E J Kuipers; H B El-Serag
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Did hospital mortality in England change from 2005 to 2010? A retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Richard M Jacques; James Fotheringham; Michael J Campbell; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with inguinal hernia.

Authors:  F Köckerling; M Maneck; C Günster; D Adolf; M Hukauf
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Social inequalities, length of hospital stay for chronic conditions and the mediating role of comorbidity and discharge destination: A multilevel analysis of hospital administrative data linked to the population census in Switzerland.

Authors:  Lucy Bayer-Oglesby; Andrea Zumbrunn; Nicole Bachmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Occurrence and Risk Factors for New Dependency on Chronic Care, Respiratory Support, Dialysis and Mortality in the First Year After Sepsis.

Authors:  Melissa Spoden; Christiane S Hartog; Peter Schlattmann; Antje Freytag; Marlies Ostermann; Lisa Wedekind; Josephine Storch; Konrad Reinhart; Christian Günster; Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Standardized Documentation in Pediatric Diabetology: Experience From Austria and Germany.

Authors:  Sabine E Hofer; Anke Schwandt; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-22

5.  Improvements in Sepsis-associated Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer versus Those without Cancer. A 12-Year Analysis Using Clinical Data.

Authors:  Alissa J Cooper; Steven P Keller; Christina Chan; Brett E Glotzbecker; Michael Klompas; Rebecca M Baron; Chanu Rhee
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-04

6.  Abdominal Surgical Procedures in Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: What Are the Risks?

Authors:  Melissa A Hite; Wolfgang B Gaertner; Bryan Garcia; Patrick A Flume; Pinckney J Maxwell; Virgilio V George; Thomas Curran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.412

7.  Reasons for readmission after hospital discharge in patients with chronic diseases-Information from an international dataset.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Carol J Peden; John Soong; Per Arne Holman; Maria Bogdanovskaya; Lorna Barclay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Circumcision and its alternatives in Germany: an analysis of nationwide hospital routine data.

Authors:  Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; Jan Gödeke; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  The impact of changes in coding on mortality reports using the example of sepsis.

Authors:  Catherine Atkin; Tanya Pankhurst; David McNulty; Ann Keogh; Suzy Gallier; Domenico Pagano; Elizabeth Sapey; Simon Ball
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Assessing the Added Value of Vital Signs Extracted from Electronic Health Records in Healthcare Risk Adjustment Models.

Authors:  Christopher Kitchen; Hsien-Yen Chang; Jonathan P Weiner; Hadi Kharrazi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-09-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.