Literature DB >> 26740493

Renal Cell Carcinomas: Sonographic Appearance Depending on Size and Histologic Type.

Kunal Sidhar1, John P McGahan2, Heather M Early1, Michael Corwin1, Ghaneh Fananapazir1, Eugenio O Gerscovich1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have demonstrated that approximately 10% of malignant renal cell carcinomas are as echogenic as angiomyolipomas on sonography. However, a recent presentation suggested that small (<1-cm) echogenic renal masses are always angiomyolipomas or other benign entities. We therefore examined our own cases of renal cell carcinoma, with corresponding sonography, to confirm that some renal cell carcinomas may also be detected as hyperechoic masses on sonography.
METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance were maintained for this retrospective review of 91 pathologically proven cases of renal cell carcinoma, with corresponding sonography. Tumors were first differentiated by histologic cell type (clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe). Tumors were then stratified according to 2 size group parameters, falling into those that were 3 cm or larger and those that were smaller than 3 cm in diameter, with the less than 3-cm group further subdivided into 2 cm or smaller and greater than 2 cm. Tumor echogenicity was graded on a 5-point scale with respect to the renal parenchyma.
RESULTS: Forty-six tumors (51%) were 3 cm in diameter or smaller, and most were found to be either isoechoic (35%) or mildly hyperechoic (26%) to the surrounding renal parenchyma. Of tumors smaller than 2 cm, most were either mildly hyperechoic (29%) or as hyperechoic as renal sinus fat (very hyperechoic; 29%). Tumors larger than 3 cm were found most often to be either isoechoic (49%) or mildly hyperechoic (33%), with only 4% found to be very hyperechoic.
CONCLUSIONS: The sonographic appearances of renal cell carcinomas include a small population that are very hyperechoic on sonography and thus could potentially be misdiagnosed as angiomyolipomas.
© 2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiomyolipoma; echogenicity; kidney neoplasm; renal cell carcinoma; renal mass; sonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26740493     DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.03051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

Review 1.  Renal Cell Carcinoma Ablation: Preprocedural, Intraprocedural, and Postprocedural Imaging.

Authors:  Winston B Joe; Jessica G Zarzour; Andrew J Gunn
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 2.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.

Authors:  Jamie Marko; Ryan Craig; Andrew Nguyen; Aaron M Udager; Darcy J Wolfman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 4.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 5.  Diagnostic Imaging for Solid Renal Tumors: A Pictorial Review.

Authors:  Tim J van Oostenbrugge; Jurgen J Fütterer; Peter F A Mulders
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 6.  Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Rosa M S Sigrist; Joy Liau; Ahmed El Kaffas; Maria Cristina Chammas; Juergen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.