Literature DB >> 26740249

Adolescent, parent and societal preferences and willingness to pay for meningococcal B vaccine: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

H S Marshall1, G Chen2, M Clarke3, J Ratcliffe3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccines have been licensed in many countries with private purchase the only option until recently, when a funded programme was introduced in the UK. The aim of this study was to explore adolescent/parental values for a variety of salient vaccine attributes (cost, effectiveness, side effect profile) to assess preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a MenB vaccine.
METHODOLOGY: A national cross-sectional population study was conducted in Australia using Discrete Choice Experiment methodology to assess adolescent/parent/adult preferences for attributes related to MenB vaccine.
RESULTS: 2003 adults and 502 adolescents completed the survey in 2013. The majority of participants were willing to be vaccinated with MenB vaccine with vaccination opt-out chosen by 11.9% of adolescents and parents, and 18.2% of non-parent adults. A mixed logit regression model examining adolescent/adult preferences indicated consistent findings; the higher the effectiveness, the longer the duration of protection, the less chance of adverse events and the lower the cost, the more likely respondents were to agree to vaccination. For an ideal MenB vaccine, including the most favoured level of each attribute summed together (90% effectiveness, 10 year duration, 1 injection, no adverse events) adolescents would pay AU$251.60 and parents AU$295.10. Adolescents and parents would pay AU$90.70 or AU$127.20 for 90% vaccine effectiveness vs AU$18.50 or AU$16.70 for 70% effectiveness and would want to be financially compensated for 50% effectiveness; pay AU$63.30 or AU$76.40 for 10 years protection; and pay AU$48.50 or AU$49.20 for no vaccine related adverse events. A slight fever post vaccination was a preferred choice with parents and adolescents willing to pay AU$9.60 or AU$12.30 for this attribute.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine effectiveness, adverse events and duration of immunity are important drivers for parental and adolescent decisions about WTP for MenB vaccine and should be included in discussions on the benefits, risks and cost.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete Choice Experiment; Health economics; MenB vaccine; Vaccine effectiveness; Values

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26740249     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  20 in total

1.  Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescent Populations: An Empirical Comparison of the CHU9D and the PedsQLTM 4.0 Short Form 15.

Authors:  Karin Dam Petersen; Gang Chen; Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa; Katherine Stevens; John Brazier; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature.

Authors:  Christine Michaels-Igbokwe; Shannon MacDonald; Gillian R Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  The Value(s) of Vaccination: Building the Scientific Evidence According to a Value-Based Healthcare Approach.

Authors:  Giovanna Elisa Calabro'; Elettra Carini; Alessia Tognetto; Irene Giacchetta; Ester Bonanno; Marco Mariani; Walter Ricciardi; Chiara de Waure
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Parental preference for influenza vaccine for children in China: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Shunping Li; Tiantian Gong; Gang Chen; Ping Liu; Xiaozhen Lai; Hongguo Rong; Xiaochen Ma; Zhiyuan Hou; Hai Fang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Preference of influenza vaccination among the elderly population in Shaanxi province, China.

Authors:  Minghuan Jiang; Pengchao Li; Xuelin Yao; Khezar Hayat; Yilin Gong; Shan Zhu; Jin Peng; Xinke Shi; Zhaojing Pu; Yifan Huang; Yu Fang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Christine Michaels-Igbokwe; Gillian R Currie; Bryanne L Kennedy; Karen V MacDonald; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Parents' willingness to pay for a COVID-19 vaccine for themselves and their children in the United States.

Authors:  Serkan Catma; Diana Reindl
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: The role of vaccine attributes, incentives, and misinformation.

Authors:  Sarah Kreps; Nabarun Dasgupta; John S Brownstein; Yulin Hswen; Douglas L Kriner
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 7.344

9.  Adolescent values for immunisation programs in Australia: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Gang Chen; Julie Ratcliffe; Hossein Haji Ali Afzali; Lynne Giles; Helen Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Gemma Lasseter; Hareth Al-Janabi; Caroline L Trotter; Fran E Carroll; Hannah Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.