Literature DB >> 26739905

Surgical Outcomes of the Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament According to the Involvement of the C2 Segment.

Soo Eon Lee1, Tae-Ahn Jahng2, Hyun-Jib Kim3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The complex structure around the upper cervical spine makes surgical treatment difficult. the present study aimed to analyze how patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving the C2 were managed and to compare the surgical outcomes according to the C2 involvement.
METHODS: Ninety-five patients with cervical OPLL who underwent surgical treatment were divided into C2 involvement (C2+ group, 40 patients) or none (C2- group, 55 patients). In the C2+ group, subanalysis was conducted to according to the C2 surgery (C2 surgery+ group, 14 patients).
RESULTS: All patients had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up with a mean of 51.36 months. The most common location of the narrowest space available for the spinal cord was C2 and C5 in the C2+ and C2- groups, respectively. In the C2+ group, a longer OPLL with thickened diameter was radiographically demonstrated, but clinical outcomes were not different from the C2- group. In the C2 surgery+ group, the narrowest spinal cord was common in the C2 (50.0%), and an extension of the signal change of spinal cord to the C2 was observed in 4 patients, showing a statistical difference. C2 surgery was performed in all patients using the posterior approach and it did not result in different clinical outcomes or surgery-related complications. An anterior surgical approach was deemed risky given the chance of the development of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Both of C2 involvement from OPLL and surgery including the C2 did not affect clinical outcomes. The posterior decompressive surgery is safer and more effective than the anterior approach regarding the development of surgery-related complications.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2; Decompressive surgery; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Upper cervical spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26739905     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Radiological manifestations and surgical outcome of combined upper cervical cord compression and cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Hao Li; Xiaopeng Zhou; Gang Chen; Fangcai Li; Junfeng Zhu; Qixin Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasonic Bone Curette-assisted Dome-like Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Baifeng Sun; Chen Xu; Shenshen Wu; Yizhi Zhang; Huiqiao Wu; Min Qi; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan; Yang Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Double Dome Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for C2 Decompression.

Authors:  Dong-Ho Lee; Gian Karlo P Dadufalza; Jong-Min Baik; Sehan Park; Jae Hwan Cho; Chang Ju Hwang; Choon Sung Lee
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Clinical application of the C2 pars screw technique in the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Heng-Rui Chang; Zhen Liu; Zhi-Wei Wang; Wen-Yuan Ding; Da-Long Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Risk factors for poor neurological outcomes after unilateral open-door laminoplasty: an analysis of the characteristics of ectopic bone.

Authors:  Zijian Hua; Jia Li; Wenshuai Li; Yu Zhang; Feng Wang; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.