Literature DB >> 2673975

Evaluation questions for Philadelphia's capitation plan for mental health services.

A P Schinnar1, A B Rothbard.   

Abstract

Public policy should be guided by sound data emerging from quality research. A shift in the financing of medical and psychiatric care toward capitation models represents a major change, and the Philadelphia capitation experiment described in the April column is one pioneering effort. The answers to the following evaluation questions about the Philadelphia experiment will help decision makers across the country as they contemplate a policy shift from retrospective to prospective payment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2673975     DOI: 10.1176/ps.40.7.681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-1597


  6 in total

1.  Methodological advances in the use of recidivism rates to assess mental health treatment programs.

Authors:  T L Hafemeister; S M Banks
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

2.  Use of Medicaid for mental health care by clients of community support programs.

Authors:  E J Hollingsworth
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1994-12

Review 3.  Health maintenance organizations and persons with severe mental illness.

Authors:  B H McFarland
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1994-06

4.  Services utilization before and after the prospective payment system by patients with somatization disorder.

Authors:  M Zhang; B M Booth; G R Smith
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Opportunities and risks in Philadelphia's capitation financing of public psychiatric services.

Authors:  A P Schinnar; A B Rothbard; T R Hadley
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1989

6.  Medicaid support of alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health services.

Authors:  G E Wright; J A Buck
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1991
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.