Literature DB >> 26739439

Short Communication: Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia by Detection of DNA in Blood and Oropharyngeal Wash, Compared with Sputum.

Clare van Halsema1, Leann Johnson1, Joanne Baxter1, Sam Douthwaite1, Yvonne Clowes1, Malcolm Guiver2, Andrew Ustianowski1.   

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic methods on lower respiratory specimens for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) are recommended, but specimens can be difficult to obtain. This study examined the diagnostic use of PCP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on oropharyngeal wash (OPW) and blood versus sputum (spontaneous and induced) to find faster, simpler, and less invasive diagnostic methods. We prospectively recruited consenting adults with symptoms consistent with PCP. Real-time PCR targeted the Pneumocystis mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, using the aforementioned specimens. Clinical data were collected from routine records. Forty-five participants provided 45 sputa, 31 OPW, and 41 blood samples. Median age was 39 years and 41 (91%) were male, with median CD4 count being 64 cells/μL. Sputum PCR was positive in 27/45 (60%) participants. Comparative sensitivity of OPW was 9/19 (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 23-71) and blood 12/24 (50%, 95% CI 29-71) participants, both with specificity 100%. Including only samples obtained ≤2 days after start of treatment, sensitivity of OPW was 80% (8/10, 95% CI 51-100), that of blood was 57% (8/14, 95% CI 29-86), and that of combined tests was 88% (14/16, 95% CI 70-100). In 14/16 individuals with PCP and specimens obtained ≤2 days after start of treatment, diagnosis was possible using nonrespiratory samples. Despite moderate sensitivity of individual tests, combined PCP PCR on early blood and OPW specimens had high sensitivity and could reduce the need for invasive procedures. There were no false-positive results on nonrespiratory samples. Sampling and laboratory methods use routine technology and so require few additional resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26739439     DOI: 10.1089/AID.2015.0213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses        ISSN: 0889-2229            Impact factor:   2.205


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A review of current methods and novel approaches.

Authors:  Marjorie Bateman; Rita Oladele; Jay K Kolls
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Accuracy of Pneumocystis jirovecii Plasma Cell-Free DNA PCR for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Pneumocystis Pneumonia.

Authors:  Angel Moreno; David Epstein; Indre Budvytiene; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 11.677

3.  Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia with serum cell-free DNA in non-HIV-infected immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Yang Hu; Ting Li; Heng-Mo Rong; Zhao-Hui Tong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-20

Review 4.  Non-culture based assays for the detection of fungal pathogens.

Authors:  S Otašević; S Momčilović; N M Stojanović; M Skvarč; K Rajković; V Arsić-Arsenijević
Journal:  J Mycol Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.391

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.