Literature DB >> 26739396

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Platelet Activation Induced by Coronary Procedures.

Gaetano Antonio Lanza1, Alessandra Stazi2, Angelo Villano2, Flavia Torrini2, Maria Milo2, Marianna Laurito2, Davide Flego2, Cristina Aurigemma2, Giovanna Liuzzo2, Filippo Crea2.   

Abstract

In this study, we aim to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces platelet activation during coronary angiography (CA) and/or percutaneous coronary interventions. We studied 30 patients who underwent CA because of a suspect of stable angina. Patients were randomized to RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia) or sham RIPC (controls) before the procedure. Blood samples were collected at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and 24 hours later. Monocyte-platelet aggregate (MPA) formation and platelet CD41 in the MPA gate and CD41 and CD62 expression in the platelet gate were assessed by flow cytometry, in the absence and in the presence of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation. A significant increase in platelet activation occurred during the invasive procedure in controls, which persisted at 24 hours. However, compared with controls, RIPC group showed no or a lower increase in platelet variables, including MPA formation (p <0.0001) and CD41 (p = 0.002) in the MPA gate and CD41 (p <0.0001) and CD62 (p = 0.002) in the platelet gate. ADP increased platelet activation at baseline, but did not further increase platelet reactivity during the invasive procedure in either groups. Percutaneous coronary interventions, performed in 10 patients (6 in the RIPC group and 4 in controls), did not have any further significant effect on platelet activation and reactivity compared with CA alone. In conclusion, RIPC reduces platelet activation occurring during CA. In contrast, no effects were observed on platelet response to ADP stimulation, probably related to the administration of an ADP antagonist in all patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26739396     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

Review 1.  Current Modalities and Mechanisms Underlying Cardioprotection by Ischemic Conditioning.

Authors:  John H Rosenberg; John H Werner; Michael J Moulton; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning and its signal transduction.

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard; Andreas Skyschally; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Platelet-Mediated Transfer of Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Its Abrogation by Aspirin But Not by Ticagrelor.

Authors:  Helmut Raphael Lieder; Maria Tsoumani; Ioanna Andreadou; Karsten Schrör; Gerd Heusch; Petra Kleinbongard
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.947

4.  Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet reactivity and endogenous fibrinolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a substudy of the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Diana A Gorog; Mohamed Farag; Nikolaos Spinthakis; Derek M Yellon; Hans Erik Bøtker; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Chronic remote ischemic conditioning for cardiovascular protection.

Authors:  Jun Chong; Heerajnarain Bulluck; Andrew Fw Ho; William A Boisvert; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2019-08

6.  Is there a role for remote ischemic conditioning in preventing 5-fluorouracil-induced coronary vasospasm?

Authors:  Jun Chong; Andrew Fw Ho; Jonathan Yap; Heerajnarain Bulluck; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2019-10

Review 7.  Platelets in cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a promising therapeutic target.

Authors:  Melanie Ziegler; Xiaowei Wang; Karlheinz Peter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on hemostasis and fibrinolysis in head and neck cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas Engel Krag; Birgitte Jul Kiil; Christine Lodberg Hvas; Anne-Mette Hvas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The platelet paradox of injury versus protection in myocardial infarction-has it been overlooked?

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard; Ioanna Andreadou; Gemma Vilahur
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 17.165

10.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andreas E Krag; Anne-Mette Hvas; Christine L Hvas; Birgitte J Kiil
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.