Literature DB >> 26739336

The advantages of incorporating liquid-based cytology (TACAS™) in mass screening for cervical cancer.

Yoshihito Yokoyama1, Masayuki Futagami2, Jun Watanabe3, Atsushi Sakuraba4, Kazuma Nagasawa4, Hidetoshi Maruyama5, Shigemi Sato6.   

Abstract

We incorporated liquid-based cytology (LBC) in population-based screening for cervical cancer. The usefulness of using LBC in mass screening for cervical cancer was examined. From 2009 to 2014, 157,061 individuals underwent mass screening for cervical cancer in Aomori Prefecture. From 2009 to 2011, cells were collected from 82,218 individuals and the specimens were conventionally prepared (CP). From 2012 to 2014, cells were collected from 74,843 individuals and the specimens were prepared using LBC (TACAS™). Cytology results for the 2 sets of specimens were compared and differences in cytologic features were examined. ASC-US and more severe lesions were detected at a rate of 1.13 % by CP and 1.44 % by LBC, so LBC had a 1.3-fold higher rate of detection. LBC had a 1.6-fold higher rate of LSIL detection and a 1.2-fold higher rate of HSIL detection. CP detected cancer in 20 cases at a rate of 0.024 % while LBC detected cancer in 18 cases at a rate of 0.024 %. Cytodiagnosis of the 18 cases of SCC that LBC identified revealed that 7 were SCC, 8 were HSIL, and 3 were ASC-H. Atypical cells tended to be smaller with TACAS™. LBC reduced the time needed for microscopic examination of a single specimen by 42 % in comparison to CP. LBC using TACAS™ allowed the detection of slight lesions and slight changes in cells. LBC can lessen the burden on medical personnel and may lead to improved accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Liquid-based cytology; Mass screening; TACAS™

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26739336     DOI: 10.1007/s13577-015-0130-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Cell        ISSN: 0914-7470            Impact factor:   4.174


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of BD Surepath and ThinPrep Pap systems in the processing of mucus-rich specimens.

Authors:  Shelly Kenyon; Brenda J Sweeney; James Happel; Gloria E Marchilli; Barbara Weinstein; Douglas Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Comparison of the effectiveness of two liquid-based Papanicolaou systems in the handling of adverse limiting factors, such as excessive blood.

Authors:  Brenda J Sweeney; Zafarul Haq; James F Happel; Barbara Weinstein; Douglas Schneider
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.

Authors:  B Kirschner; K Simonsen; J Junge
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  Conventional cervical cytologic smears vs. ThinPrep smears. A paired comparison study on cervical cytology.

Authors:  A Ferenczy; J Robitaille; E Franco; J Arseneau; R M Richart; T C Wright
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

5.  Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Overview and evaluation of systems available.

Authors:  E McGoogan; A Reith
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.319

6.  Newly developed liquid-based cytology. TACAS™: cytological appearance and HPV testing using liquid-based sample.

Authors:  Kaneyuki Kubushiro; Hideki Taoka; Nobuyuki Sakurai; Yasuhiro Yamamoto; Akiko Kurasaki; Yasuyuki Asakawa; Minoru Iwahara; Kei Takahashi
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.

Authors:  C Bergeron; J Bishop; A Lemarie; F Cas; J Ayivi; B Huynh; R Barrasso
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  Application of a new liquid-based procedure (TACAS) for the screening of cervical cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuramoto; Yoshiko Iwami; Naoko Sugimoto; Chizuyo Kato; Takashi Sugahara; Manichi Iida
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.319

9.  Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Björn Strander; Agneta Andersson-Ellström; Ian Milsom; Thomas Rådberg; Walter Ryd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Hyperchromatic crowded groups in cervical cytology--differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Dina R Mody; Edward Wang; Jennifer Haja; Terence J Colgan
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.