Literature DB >> 26738433

Use of registration-based contour propagation in texture analysis for esophageal cancer pathologic response prediction.

Stephen S F Yip1, Thibaud P Coroller, Nina N Sanford, Elizabeth Huynh, Harvey Mamon, Hugo J W L Aerts, Ross I Berbeco.   

Abstract

Change in PET-based textural features has shown promise in predicting cancer response to treatment. However, contouring tumour volumes on longitudinal scans is time-consuming. This study investigated the usefulness of contour propagation in texture analysis for the purpose of pathologic response prediction in esophageal cancer. Forty-five esophageal cancer patients underwent PET/CT scans before and after chemo-radiotherapy. Patients were classified into responders and non-responders after the surgery. Physician-defined tumour ROIs on pre-treatment PET were propagated onto the post-treatment PET using rigid and ten deformable registration algorithms. PET images were converted into 256 discrete values. Co-occurrence, run-length, and size zone matrix textures were computed within all ROIs. The relative difference of each texture at different treatment time-points was used to predict the pathologic responders. Their predictive value was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Propagated ROIs from different algorithms were compared using Dice similarity index (DSI). Contours propagated by the fast-demons, fast-free-form and rigid algorithms did not fully capture the high FDG uptake regions of tumours. Fast-demons propagated ROIs had the least agreement with other contours (DSI = 58%). Moderate to substantial overlap were found in the ROIs propagated by all other algorithms (DSI = 69%-79%). Rigidly propagated ROIs with co-occurrence texture failed to significantly differentiate between responders and non-responders (AUC = 0.58, q-value = 0.33), while the differentiation was significant with other textures (AUC = 0.71-0.73, p < 0.009). Among the deformable algorithms, fast-demons (AUC = 0.68-0.70, q-value < 0.03) and fast-free-form (AUC = 0.69-0.74, q-value < 0.04) were the least predictive. ROIs propagated by all other deformable algorithms with any texture significantly predicted pathologic responders (AUC = 0.72-0.78, q-value < 0.01). Propagated ROIs using deformable registration for all textures can lead to accurate prediction of pathologic response, potentially expediting the temporal texture analysis process. However, fast-demons, fast-free-form, and rigid algorithms should be applied with care due to their inferior performance compared to other algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26738433     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

Review 1.  Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Elisa Scalco; Giovanna Rizzo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiomic-Based Pathological Response Prediction from Primary Tumors and Lymph Nodes in NSCLC.

Authors:  Raymond H Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts; Thibaud P Coroller; Vishesh Agrawal; Elizabeth Huynh; Vivek Narayan; Stephanie W Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Reliability of PET/CT Shape and Heterogeneity Features in Functional and Morphologic Components of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors: A Repeatability Analysis in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort.

Authors:  Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Florent Tixier; Wolfgang A Weber; Barry A Siegel; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Dimitris Visvikis; Mathieu Hatt
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  4D-CT deformable image registration using multiscale unsupervised deep learning.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Tonghe Wang; Yingzi Liu; Pretesh Patel; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Texture analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Megumi Jinguji; Yoshiaki Nakabeppu; Masayuki Nakajo; Ryutarou Higashi; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Ken Sasaki; Yasuto Uchikado; Shoji Natsugoe; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Applications and limitations of radiomics.

Authors:  Stephen S F Yip; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The emerging field of radiomics in esophageal cancer: current evidence and future potential.

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Cai Xu; David V Fried; Lucas Goense; Laurence E Court; Steven H Lin
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.241

8.  Delta-radiomics increases multicentre reproducibility: a phantom study.

Authors:  Valerio Nardone; Alfonso Reginelli; Cesare Guida; Maria Paola Belfiore; Michelangelo Biondi; Maria Mormile; Fabrizio Banci Buonamici; Eugenio Di Giorgio; Marco Spadafora; Paolo Tini; Roberta Grassi; Luigi Pirtoli; Pierpaolo Correale; Salvatore Cappabianca; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Texture analysis of CT imaging for assessment of esophageal squamous cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Song Liu; Huanhuan Zheng; Xia Pan; Ling Chen; Minke Shi; Yue Guan; Yun Ge; Jian He; Zhengyang Zhou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Predictive radiomics signature for treatment response to nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eoghan R Malone; Hao-Wen Sim; Audrius Stundzia; Sacha Pierre; Ur Metser; Martin O'Malley; Adrian G Sacher; Srikala S Sridhar; Aaron R Hansen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.