Literature DB >> 2673780

Purification and characterization of trimming glucosidase I from pig liver.

E Bause1, J Schweden, A Gross, B Orthen.   

Abstract

Trimming glucosidase I has been purified about 400-fold from pig liver crude microsomes by fractional salt/detergent extraction, affinity chromatography and poly(ethylene glycol) precipitation. The purified enzyme has an apparent molecular mass of 85 kDa, and is an N-glycoprotein as shown by its binding to concanavalin A-Sepharose and its susceptibility to endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase (endo H). The native form of glucosidase I is unusually resistant to non-specific proteolysis. The enzyme can, however, be cleaved at high, that is equimolar, concentrations of trypsin into a defined and enzymatically active mixture of protein fragments with molecular mass of 69 kDa, 45 kDa and 29 kDa, indicating that it is composed of distinct protein domains. The two larger tryptic fragments can be converted by endo H to 66 kDa and 42 kDa polypeptides, suggesting that glucosidase I contains one N-linked high-mannose sugar chain. Purified pig liver glucosidase I hydrolyzes specifically the terminal alpha 1-2-linked glucose residue from natural Glc3-Man9-GlcNAc2, but is inactive towards Glc2-Man9-GlcNAc2 or nitrophenyl-/methyl-umbelliferyl-alpha-glucosides. The enzyme displays a pH optimum close to 6.4, does not require metal ions for activity and is strongly inhibited by 1-deoxynojirimycin (Ki approximately 2.1 microM), N,N-dimethyl-1-deoxynojirimycin (Ki approximately 0.5 microM) and N-(5-carboxypentyl)-1-deoxynojirimycin (Ki approximately 0.45 microM), thus closely resembling calf liver and yeast glucosidase I. Polyclonal antibodies raised against denatured pig liver glucosidase I, were found to recognize specifically the 85 kDa enzyme protein in Western blots of crude pig liver microsomes. This antibody also detected proteins of similar size in crude microsomal preparations from calf and human liver, calf kidney and intestine, indicating that the enzymes from these cells have in common one or more antigenic determinants. The antibody failed to cross-react with the enzyme from chicken liver, yeast and Volvox carteri under similar experimental conditions, pointing to a lack of sufficient similarity to convey cross-reactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2673780     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb21096.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cell biology of the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus through proteomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey Smirle; Catherine E Au; Michael Jain; Kurt Dejgaard; Tommy Nilsson; John Bergeron
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Specificity of Processing α-glucosidase I is guided by the substrate conformation: crystallographic and in silico studies.

Authors:  Megan K Barker; David R Rose
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  p32 regulates ER stress and lipid homeostasis by down-regulating GCS1 expression.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Patrick L Leslie; Aiwen Jin; Koji Itahana; Lee M Graves; Yanping Zhang
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A novel disorder caused by defective biosynthesis of N-linked oligosaccharides due to glucosidase I deficiency.

Authors:  G J Gerwig; E Bause; L K Nuytinck; J F Vliegenthart; W Breuer; J P Kamerling; M F Espeel; J J Martin; N W Chan; G A Dacremont
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Expression of α-subunit of α-glucosidase II in adult mouse brain regions and selected organs.

Authors:  Antje Anji; Hayley Miller; Chandrasekar Raman; Mathew Phillips; Gary Ciment; Meena Kumari
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Heterologous expression and characterization of processing α-glucosidase I from Aspergillus brasiliensis ATCC 9642.

Authors:  Takatsugu Miyazaki; Yuji Matsumoto; Kana Matsuda; Yuma Kurakata; Ichiro Matsuo; Yukishige Ito; Atsushi Nishikawa; Takashi Tonozuka
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 7.  Quality control of glycoprotein folding and ERAD: the role of N-glycan handling, EDEM1 and OS-9.

Authors:  Jürgen Roth; Christian Zuber
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  N-Glycosylation.

Authors:  Tetsuya Hirata; Yasuhiko Kizuka
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 3.650

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.