Literature DB >> 26736042

Pacing, packing and sex-based differences in Olympic and IAAF World Championship marathons.

Brian Hanley1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe pacing profiles and packing behaviours of athletes in Olympic and World Championship marathons. Finishing and split times were collated for 673 men and 549 women across nine competitions. The mean speeds for each intermediate 5 km and end 2.2 km segments were calculated. Medallists of both sexes maintained even-paced running from 10 km onwards whereas slower finishers dropped off the lead pack at approximately half-distance. Athletes who ran with the same opponents throughout slowed the least in the second half (P < 0.001, men: ES ≥ 1.19; women: ES ≥ 1.06), whereas other strategies such as moving between packs or running alone were less successful. Overall, women slowed less (P < 0.001, ES = 0.44) and were more likely to run a negative split (P < 0.001), and their more conservative start meant fewer women dropped out (P < 0.001). This also meant that women medallists sped up in the final 2.2 km, which might have decided the medal positions. Marathon runners are advised to identify rivals with similar abilities and ambitions to run alongside provided they start conservatively. Coaches should note important sex-based differences in tactics adopted and design training programmes accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elite-standard athletes; endurance; fatigue; gender; race tactics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26736042     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1132841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  19 in total

Review 1.  Pacing Decision Making in Sport and the Effects of Interpersonal Competition: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Marco J Konings; Florentina J Hettinga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Sex Differences in Endurance Running.

Authors:  Thibault Besson; Robin Macchi; Jeremy Rossi; Cédric Y M Morio; Yoko Kunimasa; Caroline Nicol; Fabrice Vercruyssen; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Pacing in a 94-year-old runner during a 6-hour run.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle; Pantelis T Nikolaidis
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-05

4.  Different race pacing strategies among runners covering the 2017 Berlin Marathon under 3 hours and 30 minutes.

Authors:  Iker Muñoz-Pérez; Marcos Mecías-Calvo; Jorge Crespo-Álvarez; María Luisa Sámano-Celorio; Pablo Agudo-Toyos; Carlos Lago-Fuentes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of IMU Design on IMU-Derived Stride Metrics for Running.

Authors:  Michael V Potter; Lauro V Ojeda; Noel C Perkins; Stephen M Cain
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Thinking and Action: A Cognitive Perspective on Self-Regulation during Endurance Performance.

Authors:  Noel E Brick; Tadhg E MacIntyre; Mark J Campbell
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Can Pacing Be Regulated by Post-Activation Potentiation? Insights from a Self-Paced 30 km Trial in Half-Marathon Runners.

Authors:  Sebastián Del Rosso; Edilberto Barros; Laís Tonello; Iransé Oliveira-Silva; David G Behm; Carl Foster; Daniel A Boullosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fast men slow more than fast women in a 10 kilometer road race.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Vittorio Addona; Rickey E Carter; Michael J Joyner; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Effect of age and performance on pacing of marathon runners.

Authors:  Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-21

10.  The effect of sex and performance level on pacing in cross-country skiers: Vasaloppet 2004-2017.

Authors:  Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Elias Villiger; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 7.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.