| Literature DB >> 26735940 |
Alexander J Meeske1, Christopher D A Rodrigues1, Jacqueline Brady1, Hoong Chuin Lim1, Thomas G Bernhardt1, David Z Rudner1.
Abstract
The differentiation of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis into a dormant spore is among the most well-characterized developmental pathways in biology. Classical genetic screens performed over the past half century identified scores of factors involved in every step of this morphological process. More recently, transcriptional profiling uncovered additional sporulation-induced genes required for successful spore development. Here, we used transposon-sequencing (Tn-seq) to assess whether there were any sporulation genes left to be discovered. Our screen identified 133 out of the 148 genes with known sporulation defects. Surprisingly, we discovered 24 additional genes that had not been previously implicated in spore formation. To investigate their functions, we used fluorescence microscopy to survey early, middle, and late stages of differentiation of null mutants from the B. subtilis ordered knockout collection. This analysis identified mutants that are delayed in the initiation of sporulation, defective in membrane remodeling, and impaired in spore maturation. Several mutants had novel sporulation phenotypes. We performed in-depth characterization of two new factors that participate in cell-cell signaling pathways during sporulation. One (SpoIIT) functions in the activation of σE in the mother cell; the other (SpoIIIL) is required for σG activity in the forespore. Our analysis also revealed that as many as 36 sporulation-induced genes with no previously reported mutant phenotypes are required for timely spore maturation. Finally, we discovered a large set of transposon insertions that trigger premature initiation of sporulation. Our results highlight the power of Tn-seq for the discovery of new genes and novel pathways in sporulation and, combined with the recently completed null mutant collection, open the door for similar screens in other, less well-characterized processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26735940 PMCID: PMC4703394 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Biol ISSN: 1544-9173 Impact factor: 8.029
Fig 1Tn-seq screen for new sporulation genes.
(A) Flow diagram of the screen. A Mariner-based transposon library was grown in sporulation medium. At the onset of starvation (T0), a sample was removed. The remaining culture was allowed to sporulate for 24 h (T24). Heat treatment at 80°C for 20 min killed vegetative cells and sporulation-defective mutants (pink circles). The surviving spores (blue circles) were germinated on LB agar plates and the resulting colonies pooled. The transposon insertion sites and their abundance were determined for the T0 sample and the T24 heat-resistant colony forming units (CFU) by deep sequencing and mapping onto a reference genome (see Methods). Transposon insertion profiles from two regions of the genome are depicted. The height of each vertical line reflects the number of sequencing reads at this position. Transposon insertions in previously identified sporulation genes such as spoIIGA, sigE, and sigG were statistically underrepresented after sporulation. A new sporulation gene, spoIIT (formerly ywmB) had 5.8-fold fewer transposon insertions after sporulation. Insertions in the essential murAA gene were not tolerated under either condition. (B) Scatterplot showing the extent of decrease in transposon insertions in all genes at T24. Previously identified sporulation genes are highlighted in pink. For each gene, the–log of the Mann Whitney U p-value comparing the T0 and T24 libraries is plotted against the fold reduction in transposon insertions at T24. The statistical significance thresholds (p <0.05, fold reduction >2) are highlighted by dashed red lines. All sporulation genes, including those outside the statistical significance thresholds, are listed in S1 Table. (C) Scatterplot showing the extent of decrease in transposon insertions in all genes at T5. The data are displayed as in (B). A more stringent significance threshold for fold reduction (>5-fold) was used for this dataset. The complete list of hits can be found in S2 Table. The raw underlying numerical data for Fig 1B and 1C can be found in S1 Data.
Independently validated sporulation genes identified by Tn-seq.
| section | gene | fold change | description | spo (%) | cytological phenotype | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.24 × 10−12 | 24.2 | repressor of arabinose utilization | 28 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 2.53 × 10−7 | 14 | N-formylcysteine deformylase | 9 | engulfment and fission defects/reduced σG activity | ||
| 1.02 × 10−12 | 16.1 | GAP dehydrogenase | 0.3 | delayed entry/thin cells/fewer sporulating cells | ||
| 1.87 × 10−9 | 13.8 | tRNA-modifying enzyme | 23.9 | longer cells/some aberrant septa and forespores—similar to Δ | ||
| 4.96 × 10−8 | 123.8 | UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase | 0.1 | smaller and wider cells with small forespores—identical to Δ | ||
| 7.01 × 10−5 | 3.2 | repressor of myo-inositol catabolism | 38 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 1.27 × 10−6 | 2.7 | tRNA-modifying enzyme | 16 | ND | ||
| 2 × 10−5 | 3.5 | division site selection | 36 | delayed entry/aberrant forespores | ||
| 7.45 × 10−5 | 4.6 | nucleotide diphosphate kinase | 13.4 | ND | ||
| 3.04 × 10−6 | 6.7 | nanoRNase | 5 | delayed entry/some small forespores with reduced σG activity | ||
| 5.17 × 10−15 | 28.9 | UDP-glucose synthesis | 0.1 | smaller and wider cells with small forespores—identical to Δ | ||
| 3.75 × 10−7 | 26.3 | intramembrane protease | 1.4 | delayed entry/thin and oblong forespores | ||
| 6.56 × 10−4 | 4.9 | heme translocase | 45.6 | delayed entry | ||
| 3.42 × 10−7 | 26.7 | transcriptional repressor | 9.2 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 1.2 × 10−3 | 9.8 | tmRNA-binding protein | 23 | delayed entry | ||
| 5.16 × 10−6 | 3.7 | spermidine synthase | 6 | delayed entry | ||
| 4.76 × 10−10 | 5.8 | unknown | 38 | abortive disporic/impaired σE activation | ||
| 2 × 10−3 | 15.9 | unknown | 14 | small spores/reduced σG activity | ||
| 3.48 × 10−7 | 13.7 | tRNA-modifying enzyme | 21.9 | longer cells/some aberrant septa and forespores—similar to Δ | ||
| 2.41 × 10−7 | 180.8 | menaquinone synthesis | 12.7 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 8.73 × 10−5 | 11 | pyridoxal 5′-phosphate synthesis | 1.2 | ND | ||
| 1.15 × 10−4 | 359 | putative DNA-binding protein | 10 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 2.78 × 10−10 | 22.1 | Xaa-Pro peptidase | 1.2 | delayed entry | ||
| 5.8 × 10−5 | 193 | general stress protein/sigB/sigH | 39.6 | aberrant membrane morphologies | ||
| 1.58 × 10−15 | 24.2 | asparagine synthase (σE regulon) | 0 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 7.79 × 10−16 | 600.7 | ATPase subunit of ClpCP | 0.4 | delayed entry/engulfment defect/small spores/reduced σG activity | ||
| 3.23 × 10−2 | 2.3 | coat protein (σE and σK regulons) | 49.1 | ND | ||
| 6.54 × 10−13 | 39.3 | DD-carboxypeptidase | 19.3 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 2.56 × 10−5 | 170.3 | undecaprenol kinase/cortex synthesis | 33.7 | ND | ||
| 3.21 × 10−3 | 2.8 | division site selection/σF activity | 11.1 | ND | ||
| 3.51 × 10−9 | 81.5 | ABC transporter family | 0.1 | ND | ||
| 6.79 × 10−10 | 19.5 | ABC transporter family | 13.4 | ND | ||
| 3 × 10−7 | 200 | elongation factor P | 1 | ND | ||
| 2.14 × 10−9 | 139.1 | membrane protease | 0 | ND | ||
| 2 × 10−7 | 96.3 | cortex synthesis and/or germination (σE regulon) | 0.3 | ND | ||
| 3.73 × 10−2 | 3.5 | regulator of KinB | 74 | ND | ||
| 1.68 × 10−8 | 905.7 | lipomodification/germination | 7.7 | ND | ||
| 2.16 × 10−3 | 11.2 | trxn regulator of Mn++ transport | 8.9 | ND | ||
| 4.24 × 10−4 | 6 | phosphatase | 50.7 | ND | ||
| 6.2 × 10−3 | 3.4 | proline dehydrogenase (spo0A and σE regulons) | 0 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 4.12 × 10−3 | 9.1 | regulator of σF controlled genes | 11.6 | ND | ||
| 1.42 × 10−7 | 19.1 | export of sporulation killing factor | 54 | ND | ||
| 4.1 × 10−23 | 57.3 | export of sporulation killing factor | 62.3 | ND | ||
| 7.23 × 10−6 | 518 | polysaccharide deacetylase (σE regulon) | 5 | ND | ||
| 6.39 × 10−5 | 12.4 | cortex synthesis (σE regulon) | 17.2 | ND | ||
| 1.58 × 10−5 | 5.9 | spore coat/cortex synthesis | 11.9 | ND | ||
| 2.66 × 10−8 | 132.7 | minor UPP phosphatase | 0.4 | distended intermembrane space | ||
| 2.97 × 10−11 | 2206 | cortex synthesis (σE regulon) | 0.1 | ND | ||
| 3.9 × 10−6 | 8 | slightly reduced σG activity (σE regulon) | 13.7 | small forespores some with reduced σG activity | ||
| 2.92 × 10−13 | 801 | cortex synthesis (σE regulon) | 0 | no observable phenotype | ||
| 2.64 × 10−7 | 14.7 | phosphodiesterase/bistable gene expression | 11.4 | ND | ||
| 5.22 × 10−4 | 32.3 | unknown (σE regulon) | 72.9 | ND | ||
| 1.54 × 10−13 | 3448 | similar to UDP-glucose 4-epimerase (σE regulon) | 0 | some small spores with reduced σG activity | ||
| 6.68 × 10−9 | 15.1 | autoinducer-2 exporter family (σE regulon) | 14 | no observable phenotype |
p-value based on Mann Whitney U test comparing T0 and T24 libraries
fold change refers to number of transposon insertions at T0 compared to T24
sporulation efficiency (spo) was determine 24 h after starvation and refers to heat-resistant colony forming units (CFU) of null mutant compared to wild-type
ND, not determined.
Fig 2Tn-seq identifies developmentally delayed mutants.
(A) Transposon insertion profiles from three genomic regions are depicted from libraries prepared from the onset of starvation (T0), 5 h after entry into sporulation (T5), and after 24 h of sporulation (T24). At T24, transposon insertions in two known sporulation genes (fisB and racA) and a sporulation-induced gene (ykvU) are readily detected. However, insertions in these genes are significantly underrepresented at T5. (B) Bar graphs of spore titers at hour 5 (in blue) and 24 (in red) of wild-type and indicated null mutants identified by Tn-seq. All eight mutants from the knockout collection had their antibiotic cassette excised. Error bars represent standard error of the mean from two biological replicates. The fold reduction compared to wild type at T5 is indicated above each bar. The raw underlying numerical data for Fig 2B can be found in S1 Data. (C) Cytological analysis of wild type and ∆ykvU at hour 5 of sporulation. Phase contrast, membrane staining, and cytoplasmic mCherry (red) in the mother cell and cytoplasmic CFP (green) in the forespore are shown. The phase-bright ring around the forespore and the gap between mother cell and forespore cytoplasm in the ykvU mutant are highlighted (yellow carets). Schematic of a sporulating cell with an enlarged intermembrane space is shown. Additional examples can be found in S2B Fig. Scale bar represents 1 μm.
Fig 3Tn-seq identifies mutants that initiate sporulation prematurely.
(A) Transposon insertion profiles for two regions of the genome at T0, T5, and T24. The number of sequencing reads in these profiles is scaled 10–20 times higher than those in Figs 1 and 2. Insertions upstream of the kinA and helD genes are significantly enriched at T5. (B) Co-culture assay to assess premature spore formation of mutants identified by Tn-seq. Indicated strains were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio with a wild-type (WT) strain constitutively expressing lacZ. At the onset of starvation (T0) and after heat-treatment at T5, cultures were plated on LB agar containing X-gal to determine the ratio of mutant to WT CFU. Representative examples of plates showing T0 CFU and T5 spores (heat-resistant CFU) from three mixed cultures (WT/WT, helD over-expression (OE)/WT, and Δsda/WT) are shown. (C) Bar graph showing the competitive indices of indicated mutants and over-expression strains. The competitive index represents the ratio of mutant to WT spores at T5 divided by the ratio of mutant to WT CFU at T0. Error bars represent standard error of the mean from two biological replicates. The raw underlying numerical data for Fig 3C can be found in S1 Data. (D) A strain over-expressing helD (helD OE) initiates sporulation prematurely. The helD OE strain and WT constitutively expressing mCherry were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and cultured in sporulation medium. The cells were monitored by fluorescence microscopy for entry into sporulation as assayed by σF activity in the forespore. Both strains contain a σF-responsive promoter (P) fused to yfp (helD OE) or cfp (WT). The percentage of helD OE and WT cells that have activated σF are indicated. More than 1,000 cells were counted for each time point. Scale bar indicates 3 µm. Additional examples can be seen in S3B Fig. (E) The experiment in (D) was performed using a 1:1 co-culture of two WT strains.
Fig 4Cytological sporulation assay.
Representative images of wild-type cells harboring four transcriptional fusions at hour 1.75 (T1.75), 2.5 (T2.5), 3.5 (T3.5), and 5 (T5) of sporulation. Phase contrast, membrane staining and the indicated fluorescent fusions are shown. Scale bar indicates 2 μm. At hour 5, sporangia with YFP in the mother cells produced under σK control have reduced σF-directed YFP in the forespore but maintain forespore CFP under σG control.
Fig 5Cytological characterization of sporulation mutants reveals diverse phenotypes.
(A) Representative images of the ∆nrnA mutant at hours 1.75 (T1.75) and 5 (T5) of sporulation. At T1.75, very few cells have polar septa indicative of impaired sporulation initiation. At T5, engulfed forespores with undetectable σG activity are highlighted (yellow carets). (B) Representative images of the ∆defB mutant at hour 3.5 (T3.5) of sporulation. Membrane fission is impaired compared to wild-type and a subset of engulfed forespores lack σG activity (yellow carets). Selected areas are enlarged to highlight asymmetric membrane migration around the forespore (red carets). (C) Representative images of the ∆clpC mutant at indicated time points. At T1.75, few cells have polar septa and a small number have σF activity. At T2.5, membrane defects during engulfment are highlighted with red carets and pinched forespores with white carets. At T5, small forespores with reduced (white carets) or undetectable (yellow carets) σG activity are indicated. (D) Representative images of the ∆uppP mutant at T5 of sporulation. Forespores with enlarged space between the outer and inner spore membranes are indicated (yellow carets). Scale bar is 2 μm. S6 and S7 Figs have representative images for all the other mutants tested.
Fig 6SpoIIIL is required for σG activation.
(A) The spoIIIL genomic locus. (B) Representative images of the ∆spoIIIL mutant and WT at hour 3.5 of sporulation. Small forespores with reduced σG activity are indicated (yellow carets). The small forespores are also highlighted by the cytoplasmic mCherry signal in the mother cell reporting on σE activity. (C) Representative images of the intergenic region between spoIIIL and comGG (P) fused to yfp at hour 2 of sporulation. WT and a ∆spoIIAC (∆sigF) mutant are shown. (D) Synergistic defects in σG activity, forespore size, and sporulation efficiency in the ∆spoIIIL ∆spoIIIAH double mutant. Representative images at hour 3.5 of sporulation are WT, ∆spoIIIL, ∆spoIIIAH, the ∆spoIIIL ∆spoIIIAH double mutant and ∆spoIIIA. Spore titer relative to wild-type spores at hour 30 are indicated at the right. Scale bar is 2 μm.
Fig 7SpoIIT is required for efficient proteolytic processing of pro-σE.
(A) The spoIIT genomic locus. Three promoters for the essential gene murAA are predicted [35] to reside in the spoIIT coding sequence. (B) Cytological analysis of a nonpolar spoIIT deletion mutant that leaves the three promoters intact. Representative images of WT, ∆spoIIT, and ∆spoIIR mutants at hour 2 of sporulation. σF activity was monitored by P-yfp (green) and σE activity by P-mcherry (blue). Scale bar indicates 1 μm. Larger fields of sporulating cells and additional time points can be found in S9 Fig. (C) Transcriptional fusions identify a σF-responsive promoter upstream of spoIIT. Two spoIIT promoter fusions to yfp are shown: one includes the upstream gene ywzB (labeled B) and its predicted σA promoter and the other contains 200 bp proximal to the spoIIT start codon. Expression from each fusion was examined in WT and a ∆spoIIAC (∆sigF) mutant at hour 1.5 of sporulation. (D) Localization of pro-σE-gfp at hour 2 of sporulation in WT, ∆spoIIT, and ∆spoIIR. Pro-σE-gfp is membrane-associated while σE-gfp is cytoplasmic and nucleoid-associated. (E) SpoIIT is required for reconstitution of the pro-σE processing pathway in vegetatively growing cells. β-galactosidase assay monitoring σE activity (P-lacZ) in strains expressing spoIIR spoIIGA, and pro-sigE during vegetative growth in the presence and absence of spoIIT. As a negative control, a strain only expressing spoIIGA and pro-sigE was also tested. Expression of spoIIGA/sigE/spoIIR was induced by the addition of 500 μM IPTG to cells growing exponentially (OD 0.2) in rich medium (casein hydrolysate [CH]). At the indicated times after induction, a sample was removed and analyzed for β-galactosidase activity. Error bars represent standard error of the mean from two biological replicates. The raw underlying numerical data for Fig 7E can be found in S1 Data. (F) Model for the proteolytic activation of σE under σF control. SpoIIR (red) and SpoIIT (purple) are made in the forespore and secreted into the intermembrane space where they activate the processing enzyme SpoIIGA (blue).