Literature DB >> 26735884

Challenges With Propensity Score Strategies in a High-Dimensional Setting and a Potential Alternative.

Jennifer Hill1, Christopher Weiss2, Fuhua Zhai3.   

Abstract

This article explores some of the challenges that arise when trying to implement propensity score strategies to answer a causal question using data with a large number of covariates. We discuss choices in propensity score estimation strategies, matching and weighting implementation strategies, balance diagnostics, and final analysis models. We demonstrate the wide range of estimates that can result from different combinations of these choices. Finally, an alternative estimation strategy is presented that may have benefits in terms of simplicity and reliability. These issues are explored in the context of an empirical example that uses data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Cohort to investigate the potential effect of grade retention after the 1st-grade year on subsequent cognitive outcomes.

Year:  2011        PMID: 26735884     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.570161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  5 in total

1.  A Viable Alternative When Propensity Scores Fail: Evaluation of Inverse Propensity Weighting and Sequential G-Estimation in a Two-Wave Mediation Model.

Authors:  Matthew J Valente; David P MacKinnon; Gina L Mazza
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  The Consequences of Contact with the Criminal Justice System for Health in the Transition to Adulthood.

Authors:  Michael H Esposito; Hedwig Lee; Margret T Hicken; Lauren C Porter; Jerald R Herting
Journal:  Longit Life Course Stud       Date:  2017

3.  Using Ensemble-Based Methods for Directly Estimating Causal Effects: An Investigation of Tree-Based G-Computation.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Propensity score weighting for causal subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Siyun Yang; Elizabeth Lorenzi; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Daniel M Wojdyla; Fan Li; Laine E Thomas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  A flexible, interpretable framework for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding.

Authors:  Vincent Dorie; Masataka Harada; Nicole Bohme Carnegie; Jennifer Hill
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.